ACYS vs. FDL
ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ACYS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. ACYS is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
ACYS vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- YTD
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.48M | $7.66M | $5.85M | |
| $52.39M | $52.32M | $42.59M |
ACYS vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between ACYS and FDL is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACYS vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
ACYS vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACYS | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACYS vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACYS | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -65.93% | +65.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -9.60% | +9.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
ACYS vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACYS | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 11.79% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 14.41% | -10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 17.15% | -13.45% |
ACYS vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACYS vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than FDL's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.57% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACYS and FDL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
ACYS is categorized as Derivative Income, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for ACYS and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer