ACYS vs. QCLN

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ACYS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. ACYS is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

ACYS vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACYS

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLN

• 1D: -6.08%
• 1M: -10.20%
• 6M: 14.54%
• YTD: 23.65%
• 1Y: 63.12%
• 3Y*: 2.05%
• 5Y*: -2.92%
• 10Y*: 14.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACYS vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	1.85%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ACYS and QCLN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

ACYS vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 61
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACYS vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACYS	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.11	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.26	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.97	—

Drawdowns

ACYS vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACYS	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.63%	-76.18%	+75.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-69.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-71.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-36.12%	+35.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.14%	-43.38%	+43.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACYS	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35%	39.02%	-35.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.35%	38.81%	-35.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.35%	35.36%	-32.01%

ACYS vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACYS vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than QCLN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.15%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACYS and QCLN in my portfolio?

ACYS and QCLN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACYS or QCLN?

On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACYS or QCLN?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACYS or QCLN?

ACYS has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.15% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between ACYS and QCLN?

ACYS is categorized as Derivative Income, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.59% for QCLN.