ACWX vs. MOTI
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ACWX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index while MOTI tracks the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 9.87%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for MOTI. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for MOTI.
Performance
ACWX vs. MOTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than MOTI's -7.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has outperformed MOTI with an annualized return of 9.87%, while MOTI has yielded a comparatively lower 6.42% annualized return.
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
MOTI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -7.14%
- 6M
- -7.41%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
ACWX vs. MOTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -7.14% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 17.63% | -13.92% | 34.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and MOTI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ACWX and MOTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACWX vs. MOTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
MOTI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ACWX
MOTI
Technology
ACWX
MOTI
Industrials
ACWX
MOTI
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
MOTI
Healthcare
ACWX
MOTI
Basic Materials
ACWX
MOTI
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
MOTI
Energy
ACWX
MOTI
-
Communication Services
ACWX
MOTI
Utilities
ACWX
MOTI
-
Real Estate
ACWX
MOTI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. MOTI — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
MOTI
ACWX vs. MOTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWX | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.03 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 0.12 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 0.30 | +9.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. MOTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than MOTI's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and MOTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -36.70% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -15.45% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -16.35% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -31.03% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -36.70% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -12.58% | +10.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -9.14% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 6.04% | -3.06% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. MOTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) at 3.50%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | MOTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 3.50% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 11.14% | +3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 14.41% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 17.55% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 18.05% | -0.62% |
ACWX vs. MOTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTI's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. MOTI - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than MOTI's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.47% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWX and MOTI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to MOTI (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs MOTI's -36.70%.
On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.87% vs 6.42% for MOTI. On fees, ACWX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.49% for ACWX.
ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.57% for MOTI.
ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and MOTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer