ACWX vs. ESGYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and ESGYX (Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund) are both funds - ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while ESGYX is a Global Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 5 years, ACWX returned 8.79%/yr vs 6.33%/yr for ESGYX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ESGYX.

Performance

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than ESGYX's 1.40% return.

ACWX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 5.30%
• YTD: 15.52%
• 6M: 18.73%
• 1Y: 32.87%
• 3Y*: 19.77%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

ESGYX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 10.07%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	15.52%	32.59%	5.17%	15.63%	-16.07%	7.67%	10.29%	21.05%	-13.99%	26.51%
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund	1.40%	15.23%	13.38%	18.63%	-22.36%	18.06%	32.43%	33.00%	-6.37%	29.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and ESGYX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.81

The correlation between ACWX and ESGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACWX vs. ESGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX

ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 62
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

ESGYX

ESGYX Risk / Return Rank: 14
ESGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
ESGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ESGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ESGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ESGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWX	ESGYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	0.99	+1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.52	+1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.18	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.45	+1.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.72	4.90	+6.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the ESGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and ESGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWX	ESGYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	0.99	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.37	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.74	-0.50

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than ESGYX's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and ESGYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWX	ESGYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.40%	-34.88%	-25.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-11.49%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	-16.67%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.07%	-34.88%	+4.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.94%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.34%	-6.45%	-6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	3.41%	-0.48%

Volatility

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) at 3.12%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWX	ESGYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	3.12%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.22%	10.34%	+2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	12.99%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	17.63%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.38%	17.66%	-0.28%

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGYX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWX vs. ESGYX - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than ESGYX's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	2.44%	2.82%	2.97%	2.96%	2.68%	2.74%	1.88%	3.22%	2.60%	2.40%	2.77%	2.51%
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund	4.09%	4.44%	1.99%	0.61%	5.28%	12.16%	0.54%	1.84%	4.39%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWX and ESGYX in my portfolio?

ACWX and ESGYX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWX or ESGYX?

ACWX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to ESGYX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs ESGYX's -34.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.