ESGYX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
ESGYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Mar 30, 2016. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund | -6.74% | 15.23% | 13.38% | 18.63% | -22.36% | 18.06% | 32.43% | 33.00% | -6.37% | 29.83% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 27.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGYX achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return.
ESGYX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -4.95%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGYX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESGYX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ESGYX
SCHG
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.76 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.17 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.09 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 3.71 | -2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.76 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.57 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGYX and SCHG is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ESGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund | 4.76% | 4.44% | 1.99% | 0.61% | 5.28% | 12.16% | 0.54% | 1.84% | 4.39% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGYX drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGYX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.88% | -34.59% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -16.41% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.88% | -34.59% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.89% | -12.51% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -5.22% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 4.84% | -0.51% |
Volatility
ESGYX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) is 4.91%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that ESGYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESGYX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 6.77% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 12.54% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 22.45% | -4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 22.31% | -4.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 21.51% | -3.76% |