ACKY vs. IWMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ACKY (VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACKY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.

Performance

ACKY vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 16.33% return.

ACKY

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: -5.51%
• 6M: -5.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMI

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 35.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACKY vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	-5.51%	4.04%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	16.33%	5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and IWMI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	0.67

ACKY vs. IWMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACKY	IWMI
Consumer Cyclical	26.5%	8.4%
Technology	26.3%	17.0%
Financial Services	25.9%	15.7%
Communication Services	10.9%	2.4%
Real Estate	9.3%	6.1%
Industrials	0.5%	17.7%
Basic Materials	-	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Energy	-	6.1%
Healthcare	-	16.5%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

ACKY vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACKY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 79
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACKY vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACKY	IWMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.23	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.29	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.68	—

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum IWMI drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and IWMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACKY	IWMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-23.88%	+9.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.03%	-0.73%	-8.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-4.03%	+0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACKY	IWMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.85%	15.41%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	17.95%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	17.95%	-2.10%

ACKY vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACKY vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.49%, less than IWMI's 14.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	12.49%	5.06%	0.00%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.53%	14.05%	8.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACKY and IWMI in my portfolio?

ACKY and IWMI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACKY or IWMI?

On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACKY or IWMI?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ACKY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACKY or IWMI?

IWMI has the higher dividend yield at 14.53%, compared with 12.49% for ACKY.

What is the main difference between ACKY and IWMI?

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ACKY and 0.68% for IWMI.