ACKY vs. OMAH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ACKY (VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

ACKY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 9.54% return.

ACKY

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: -3.99%
• YTD: -2.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: 10.58%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 1Y: 15.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	$464.27K	$380.64K	$503.52K
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	$19.26M	$17.24M	$16.29M

ACKY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	-2.09%	4.04%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	9.54%	1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and OMAH is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	0.48

ACKY vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACKY	OMAH
Consumer Cyclical	27.8%	4.1%
Technology	27.1%	10.5%
Financial Services	24.5%	39.1%
Communication Services	12.1%	19.1%
Real Estate	8.6%	-
Industrials	0.2%	5.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	12.7%
Energy	-	7.7%
Healthcare	-	5.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ACKY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACKY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 82
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACKY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACKY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.50	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.06	—

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACKY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-11.83%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.73%	-1.05%	-4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-1.23%	-2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACKY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	8.40%	+7.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	12.84%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	12.84%	+3.23%

ACKY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACKY and OMAH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

ACKY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.79%, less than OMAH's 15.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF	14.79%	5.06%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.01%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACKY and OMAH in my portfolio?

ACKY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACKY or OMAH?

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACKY or OMAH?

ACKY and OMAH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACKY or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.01%, compared with 14.79% for ACKY.