ACIW vs. CRS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ACIW (ACI Worldwide, Inc.) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. ACIW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ACIW returned 8.12%/yr vs 35.01%/yr for CRS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACIW vs. CRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIW achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 78.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ACIW has underperformed CRS with an annualized return of 8.12%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively higher 35.01% annualized return.

ACIW

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 10.69%
• YTD: -5.38%
• 6M: -4.82%
• 1Y: 0.38%
• 3Y*: 24.77%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: 8.12%

CRS

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 30.71%
• YTD: 78.53%
• 6M: 74.76%
• 1Y: 126.36%
• 3Y*: 121.69%
• 5Y*: 68.28%
• 10Y*: 35.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIW vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACIW ACI Worldwide, Inc.	-5.38%	-7.90%	69.64%	33.04%	-33.72%	-9.71%	1.43%	36.94%	22.06%	24.90%
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation	78.53%	86.23%	141.72%	94.48%	29.50%	2.66%	-39.44%	42.12%	-29.16%	43.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIW and CRS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 1995	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between ACIW and CRS has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACIW : $4.65B CRS : $28.24B
EPS ACIW : $1.99 CRS : $9.51
PE Ratio ACIW : 22.79 CRS : 59.07
PEG Ratio ACIW : 1.02 CRS : 0.05
PS Ratio ACIW : 2.62 CRS : 9.34
PB Ratio ACIW : 3.10 CRS : 13.66
Total Revenue (TTM) ACIW : $1.79B CRS : $3.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACIW : $878.23M CRS : $900.50M
EBITDA (TTM) ACIW : $412.16M CRS : $745.50M

Return for Risk

ACIW vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIW

ACIW Risk / Return Rank: 37
ACIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ACIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ACIW Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ACIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ACIW Martin Ratio Rank: 38

CRS

CRS Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CRS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CRS Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIW vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACIW	CRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	2.64	-2.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	3.38	-3.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.44	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	6.68	-6.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	15.72	-15.95

ACIW vs. CRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the CRS Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIW and CRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACIW vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIW drawdown since its inception was -90.10%, which is greater than CRS's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIW and CRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACIW	CRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.10%	-84.68%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.25%	-19.08%	-9.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.02%	-28.74%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.40%	-41.86%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.18%	-74.70%	+20.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.58%	-0.17%	-23.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-27.23%	-6.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.26%	8.09%	+7.17%

Volatility

ACIW vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) is 9.29%, while Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that ACIW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACIW	CRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	12.83%	-3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.94%	33.92%	-6.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.82%	48.29%	-15.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.19%	46.70%	-11.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.67%	48.88%	-13.21%

Dividends

ACIW vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison

ACIW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACIW ACI Worldwide, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation	0.14%	0.25%	0.47%	1.13%	2.17%	2.74%	2.75%	1.61%	2.13%	1.41%	1.99%	2.38%

Financials

ACIW vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACIW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 197.29M and revenue of 425.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.

CRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

ACIW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.49M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

CRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

ACIW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 38.31M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

CRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACIW and CRS in my portfolio?

ACIW and CRS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACIW or CRS?

CRS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to ACIW (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIW dropped -90.10% vs CRS's -84.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.