ACIW vs. IGM
ACIW (ACI Worldwide, Inc.) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, ACIW returned 7.10%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for IGM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ACIW vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACIW achieves a -13.07% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ACIW has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 7.10%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
ACIW
- 1D
- -4.92%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- -13.07%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- 1Y
- -11.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
ACIW vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIW ACI Worldwide, Inc. | -13.07% | -7.90% | 69.64% | 33.04% | -33.72% | -9.71% | 1.43% | 36.94% | 22.06% | 24.90% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACIW and IGM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2001 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACIW and IGM has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACIW vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
ACIW
IGM
ACIW vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACIW | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.50 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 3.81 | -4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 13.36 | -14.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACIW | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 3.07 | -3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.86 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 1.03 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.48 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
ACIW vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACIW drawdown since its inception was -90.10%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIW and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACIW | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.10% | -65.59% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.25% | -16.44% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.02% | -26.39% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.80% | -40.68% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.18% | -40.68% | -13.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.80% | -0.84% | -28.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -15.23% | -18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.04% | 4.67% | +10.37% |
Volatility
ACIW vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 6.10%. This indicates that ACIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACIW | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 6.10% | +8.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.90% | 16.08% | +10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.63% | 20.43% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 25.68% | +9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 24.54% | +11.13% |
Dividends
ACIW vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
ACIW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIW ACI Worldwide, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACIW and IGM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACIW has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIW dropped -90.10% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACIW and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer