ACGR vs. QINT
Compare and contrast key facts about American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT).
ACGR and QINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACGR is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021. QINT is a passively managed fund by American Century that tracks the performance of the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 10, 2018. Both ACGR and QINT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ACGR vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACGR vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | -9.16% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 3.66% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 15.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGR achieves a -9.16% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 3.66% return.
ACGR
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -9.16%
- 6M
- -8.61%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QINT
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 31.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACGR vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ACGR and QINT have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Return for Risk
ACGR vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank
ACGR
QINT
ACGR vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACGR | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.85 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.52 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 2.82 | -1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.84 | 11.19 | -7.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACGR | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.85 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.54 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGR and QINT is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ACGR vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QINT's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.64% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
ACGR vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, roughly equal to the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and QINT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGR | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -33.86% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -11.41% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | -33.86% | -0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.00% | -5.91% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -7.67% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 2.87% | +1.78% |
Volatility
ACGR vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) is 6.69%, while American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that ACGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACGR | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 7.38% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 11.20% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.21% | 17.29% | +4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 16.05% | +5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 18.07% | +3.50% |