ABT vs. INGR
ABT (Abbott Laboratories) and INGR (Ingredion Incorporated) are both stocks. ABT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while INGR operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ABT returned 10.94%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for INGR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABT vs. INGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -28.82% return, which is significantly lower than INGR's -6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has outperformed INGR with an annualized return of 10.94%, while INGR has yielded a comparatively lower 0.79% annualized return.
ABT
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- -28.82%
- 6M
- -28.92%
- 1Y
- -34.06%
- 3Y*
- -2.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
INGR
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.15%
- YTD
- -6.49%
- 6M
- -8.29%
- 1Y
- -25.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 0.79%
ABT vs. INGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -28.82% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | -6.49% | -17.86% | 29.22% | 14.08% | 4.47% | 26.35% | -12.55% | 4.70% | -33.10% | 13.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABT and INGR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1997 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
ABT:
$3.59
INGR:
$13.96
ABT:
24.57
INGR:
7.28
ABT:
1.53
INGR:
0.08
ABT:
3.42
INGR:
0.92
ABT:
$45.13B
INGR:
$5.41B
ABT:
$25.45B
INGR:
$1.36B
ABT:
$10.80B
INGR:
$902.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABT vs. INGR — Risk / Return Rank
ABT
INGR
ABT vs. INGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABT | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.75 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.95 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.92 | -1.58 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABT vs. INGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum INGR drawdown of -64.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and INGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABT | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -64.20% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.99% | -26.58% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -33.21% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.64% | -33.21% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.64% | -56.14% | +16.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.53% | -31.78% | -3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -18.32% | +7.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.75% | 16.03% | +1.72% |
Volatility
ABT vs. INGR - Volatility Comparison
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) at 5.82%. This indicates that ABT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABT | INGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 5.82% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.48% | 11.73% | +7.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 16.64% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 21.32% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 24.87% | -1.20% |
Dividends
ABT vs. INGR - Dividend Comparison
ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than INGR's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.77% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
INGR Ingredion Incorporated | 3.21% | 2.92% | 1.72% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 2.67% | 3.23% | 2.70% | 2.68% | 1.57% | 1.52% | 1.82% |
Financials
ABT vs. INGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Ingredion Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABT and INGR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABT has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to INGR (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABT dropped -45.66% vs INGR's -64.20%.
ABT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.40 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABT and INGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer