ABT vs. CDUAF
ABT (Abbott Laboratories) and CDUAF (Canadian Utilities Limited) are both stocks. ABT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while CDUAF operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, ABT returned 10.97%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for CDUAF. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ABT vs. CDUAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABT achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly lower than CDUAF's 31.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ABT has outperformed CDUAF with an annualized return of 10.97%, while CDUAF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return.
ABT
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 15.48%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- -14.30%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
CDUAF
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 26.63%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 51.07%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.15B | $1.25B | $1.20B | |
| $3.27M | $2.89M | $1.49M |
ABT vs. CDUAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -14.07% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 31.32% | 35.10% | 6.34% | -6.25% | -1.87% | 25.16% | -14.69% | 37.49% | -19.67% | 15.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABT and CDUAF is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.14 |
The correlation between ABT and CDUAF shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABT:
$184.11B
CDUAF:
$8.23B
ABT:
$3.11
CDUAF:
CA$0.35
ABT:
34.03
CDUAF:
158.91
ABT:
3.96
CDUAF:
4.32
ABT:
2.82
CDUAF:
3.03
ABT:
$46.59B
CDUAF:
CA$3.54B
ABT:
$26.46B
CDUAF:
CA$1.15B
ABT:
$9.94B
CDUAF:
CA$1.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABT vs. CDUAF — Risk / Return Rank
ABT
CDUAF
ABT vs. CDUAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABT | CDUAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.61 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 9.60 | -9.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 23.94 | -24.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABT vs. CDUAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum CDUAF drawdown of -71.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABT and CDUAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABT | CDUAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -71.22% | +25.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.61% | -5.35% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -13.56% | -26.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.64% | -31.94% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.64% | -41.92% | +2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.17% | -9.04% | -13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -39.68% | +28.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.16% | 2.14% | +18.02% |
Volatility
ABT vs. CDUAF - Volatility Comparison
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a higher volatility of 12.65% compared to Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) at 5.29%. This indicates that ABT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDUAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABT | CDUAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.65% | 5.29% | +7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | 12.42% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.55% | 16.46% | +10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 19.13% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 24.16% | -0.21% |
Dividends
ABT vs. CDUAF - Dividend Comparison
ABT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than CDUAF's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 3.34% | 4.21% | 5.47% | 6.05% | 5.03% | 4.85% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 4.49% | 4.82% | 4.82% | 5.11% |
Financials
ABT vs. CDUAF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abbott Laboratories and Canadian Utilities Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABT vs. CDUAF - Profitability Comparison
ABT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 7.30B and revenue of 12.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.
CDUAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 346.15M and revenue of 914.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
ABT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.78B and revenue of 12.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
CDUAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 271.12M and revenue of 914.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
ABT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 928.00M and revenue of 12.59B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
CDUAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 128.06M and revenue of 914.40M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABT and CDUAF have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABT has higher volatility (12.65%) compared to CDUAF (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABT dropped -45.66% vs CDUAF's -71.22%.
CDUAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABT and CDUAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer