PortfoliosLab logo
CDUAF vs. FRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CDUAF and FRT is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CDUAF vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CDUAF:

1.65

FRT:

0.03

Sortino Ratio

CDUAF:

1.91

FRT:

0.26

Omega Ratio

CDUAF:

1.25

FRT:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

CDUAF:

0.98

FRT:

0.05

Martin Ratio

CDUAF:

4.92

FRT:

0.16

Ulcer Index

CDUAF:

5.34%

FRT:

9.60%

Daily Std Dev

CDUAF:

19.78%

FRT:

23.48%

Max Drawdown

CDUAF:

-47.91%

FRT:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

CDUAF:

-0.07%

FRT:

-21.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDUAF:

$5.72B

FRT:

$8.28B

EPS

CDUAF:

$1.06

FRT:

$3.52

PE Ratio

CDUAF:

26.29

FRT:

27.26

PEG Ratio

CDUAF:

0.00

FRT:

3.59

PS Ratio

CDUAF:

1.53

FRT:

6.77

PB Ratio

CDUAF:

1.93

FRT:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDUAF:

$3.74B

FRT:

$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDUAF:

$2.63B

FRT:

$734.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

CDUAF:

$1.79B

FRT:

$824.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDUAF achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than FRT's -12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CDUAF has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 4.02%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.22% annualized return.


CDUAF

YTD

18.79%

1M

-0.07%

6M

11.97%

1Y

31.99%

3Y*

1.10%

5Y*

8.58%

10Y*

4.02%

FRT

YTD

-12.89%

1M

1.55%

6M

-16.40%

1Y

0.71%

3Y*

-1.86%

5Y*

8.11%

10Y*

0.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Canadian Utilities Limited

Federal Realty Investment Trust

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CDUAF vs. FRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDUAF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDUAF is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDUAF is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDUAF is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDUAF is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDUAF is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDUAF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CDUAF vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CDUAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDUAF and FRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CDUAF vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

CDUAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than FRT's 4.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CDUAF
Canadian Utilities Limited
4.66%5.47%5.53%5.03%4.85%5.32%4.24%4.15%3.95%3.61%4.11%2.73%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.60%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%

Drawdowns

CDUAF vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDUAF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum FRT drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDUAF and FRT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CDUAF vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) is 6.13%, while Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that CDUAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CDUAF vs. FRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Utilities Limited and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
1.09B
309.15M
(CDUAF) Total Revenue
(FRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CDUAF vs. FRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Utilities Limited and Federal Realty Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
71.2%
66.2%
(CDUAF) Gross Margin
(FRT) Gross Margin
CDUAF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 773.00M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.2%.

FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 204.78M and revenue of 309.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.2%.

CDUAF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 418.00M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.5%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 108.13M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

CDUAF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 236.00M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 63.77M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.