ABNY vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ABNY (YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ABNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. ABNY is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, ABNY returned 3.20% vs 59.74% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ABNY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

ABNY vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.

ABNY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: 3.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 64.09%
• 6M: 60.42%
• 1Y: 59.74%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNY vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF	0.90%	-2.05%	-9.52%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	64.09%	-2.00%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNY and UGA is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	-0.05

Return for Risk

ABNY vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 55
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNY vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABNY	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	1.73	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	2.25	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.30	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	3.17	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.25	9.39	-9.14

ABNY vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNY and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABNY vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABNY	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.62%	-86.59%	+54.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.87%	-18.96%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.16%	-18.05%	+2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	-36.69%	+20.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.00%	6.43%	+2.57%

Volatility

ABNY vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) is 5.56%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that ABNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABNY	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	9.24%	-3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.03%	30.57%	-11.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	35.22%	-10.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.88%	34.45%	-4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.88%	37.22%	-7.34%

ABNY vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABNY vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABNY nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF	51.68%	53.45%	22.09%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABNY and UGA in my portfolio?

ABNY and UGA have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABNY or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to ABNY (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, ABNY or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 59.74% vs 3.20% for ABNY. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ABNY has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABNY or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 59.74% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABNY or UGA?

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ABNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABNY or UGA?

ABNY has the higher dividend yield at 51.68%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between ABNY and UGA?

ABNY is categorized as Derivative Income, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ABNY and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.