ABNY vs. AMDY
ABNY (YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ABNY returned 0.53% vs 201.38% for AMDY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABNY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
ABNY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNY achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 117.25% return.
ABNY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 0.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 127.92%
- YTD
- 117.25%
- 1Y
- 201.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.90% | -2.05% | -9.52% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 117.25% | 53.93% | -18.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNY and AMDY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.34 |
The correlation between ABNY and AMDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
ABNY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDY
ABNY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNY | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.52 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 7.49 | -7.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 16.67 | -16.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNY drawdown since its inception was -31.62%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNY and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNY | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.62% | -53.92% | +22.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -27.59% | +9.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.16% | -2.42% | -12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -17.54% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.00% | 12.38% | -3.38% |
Volatility
ABNY vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) is 5.56%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 19.17%. This indicates that ABNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNY | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 19.17% | -13.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.03% | 44.94% | -25.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 57.13% | -32.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 47.15% | -17.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 47.15% | -17.27% |
ABNY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
ABNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF | 47.58% | 53.45% | 22.09% | 0.00% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 64.46% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDY has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to ABNY (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNY dropped -31.62% vs AMDY's -53.92%.
On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 201.38% vs 0.53% for ABNY. On fees, ABNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ABNY has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 201.38% return vs 0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.
AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 64.46%, compared with 47.58% for ABNY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ABNY and 1.23% for AMDY.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABNY and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer