ABLD vs. RDIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABLD returned 11.30%/yr vs 19.82%/yr for RDIV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

ABLD vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 13.79% return.

ABLD

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 9.80%
• 3Y*: 11.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDIV

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 13.79%
• 6M: 13.59%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLD vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.86%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	13.79%	12.36%	15.17%	4.66%	7.16%	3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLD and RDIV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021	0.75

The correlation between ABLD and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ABLD vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 20
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 78
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLD vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLD	RDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	2.15	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	3.15	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.37	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	5.95	-5.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.48	17.00	-14.52

ABLD vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLD and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABLD vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and RDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLD	RDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-49.97%	+30.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-4.84%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-17.91%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.50%	-2.54%	-7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-5.84%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	1.69%	+2.28%

Volatility

ABLD vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) is 4.19%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that ABLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLD	RDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	4.58%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.19%	9.01%	+4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	13.41%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	17.48%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	21.89%	-4.39%

ABLD vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ABLD and RDIV have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

ABLD vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than RDIV's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.35%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.72%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLD and RDIV in my portfolio?

ABLD and RDIV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLD or RDIV?

RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to ABLD (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLD dropped -19.35% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

Which ETF is better, ABLD or RDIV?

On 3-year performance, RDIV leads with 19.82% vs 11.30% for ABLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, ABLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLD or RDIV?

Over the 3-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLD or RDIV?

ABLD and RDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLD or RDIV?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 3.72% for RDIV.

What is the main difference between ABLD and RDIV?

ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.