ABLD vs. RDIV
ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABLD returned 12.75%/yr vs 19.26%/yr for RDIV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.
Performance
ABLD vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABLD achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 11.95% return.
ABLD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 15.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
ABLD vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 8.60% | 6.64% | 7.05% | 18.89% | 7.42% | 3.86% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 11.95% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 3.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABLD and RDIV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ABLD and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABLD vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
ABLD
RDIV
ABLD vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABLD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 5.61 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 16.50 | -12.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABLD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.06 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.55 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
ABLD vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLD drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLD and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -49.97% | +30.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.64% | -4.84% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -17.91% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -1.65% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -5.86% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.65% | +1.71% |
Volatility
ABLD vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) at 3.46%. This indicates that ABLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABLD | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.46% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 8.62% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 13.23% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 17.53% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 21.89% | -4.37% |
ABLD vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ABLD and RDIV have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Dividends
ABLD vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
ABLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than RDIV's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 4.20% | 2.86% | 10.13% | 4.70% | 8.40% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.66% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABLD and RDIV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABLD has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to RDIV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLD dropped -19.35% vs RDIV's -49.97%.
On 3-year performance, RDIV leads with 19.26% vs 12.75% for ABLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 19.26% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABLD and RDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.
ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 3.66% for RDIV.
ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Invesco.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABLD and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer