AAXJ vs. VUG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ returned 10.34%/yr vs 17.90%/yr for VUG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.

Performance

AAXJ vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 26.46% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 10.34%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.

AAXJ

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 26.46%
• 6M: 29.76%
• 1Y: 48.69%
• 3Y*: 22.11%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

VUG

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 22.83%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: 13.78%
• 10Y*: 17.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAXJ vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	26.46%	31.53%	10.41%	4.79%	-20.35%	-5.73%	23.35%	17.93%	-15.04%	41.76%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	4.99%	19.40%	32.69%	46.83%	-33.16%	27.35%	40.25%	37.03%	-3.32%	27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between AAXJ and VUG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2008	0.70

The correlation between AAXJ and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AAXJ vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAXJ	VUG
Technology	49.4%	53.5%
Financial Services	15.8%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	12.2%
Industrials	7.3%	3.6%
Communication Services	5.9%	17.3%
Basic Materials	3.1%	0.6%
Healthcare	2.6%	4.6%
Energy	2.2%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	1.5%
Utilities	1.6%	0.9%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.0%

Return for Risk

AAXJ vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAXJ

AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 75
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 36
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAXJ vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAXJ	VUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.29	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.78	+0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.23	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	1.29	+2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.55	4.43	+8.12

AAXJ vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAXJ and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAXJ vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, roughly equal to the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAXJ	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-50.68%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.66%	-16.53%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	-22.85%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.64%	-35.61%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.52%	-35.61%	-8.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.62%	-5.56%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.01%	-7.09%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.71%	4.79%	-1.08%

Volatility

AAXJ vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.73%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAXJ	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.46%	5.73%	+5.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.71%	13.00%	+6.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.12%	16.46%	+5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.32%	22.30%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.42%	21.48%	-1.06%

AAXJ vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAXJ vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF	1.43%	1.81%	1.86%	1.95%	1.74%	2.21%	1.06%	1.83%	2.10%	1.99%	1.77%	2.44%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAXJ and VUG in my portfolio?

AAXJ and VUG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAXJ or VUG?

AAXJ has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to VUG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs VUG's -50.68%.

Which ETF is better, AAXJ or VUG?

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.90% vs 10.34% for AAXJ. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAXJ or VUG?

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAXJ or VUG?

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAXJ or VUG?

AAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

What is the main difference between AAXJ and VUG?

AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.03% for VUG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.