AAXJ vs. EPP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP).
AAXJ and EPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAXJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2008. EPP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. Both AAXJ and EPP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAXJ or EPP.
Key characteristics
| AAXJ | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.49% | 11.62% |
| 1Y Return | 24.63% | 23.97% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.76% | 2.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.58% | 5.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.51% | 4.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.42 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.05 | 2.19 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.65 | 1.13 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.92 | 8.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.05% | 2.96% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.03% | 15.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.37% | -66.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.61% | -3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAXJ and EPP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AAXJ vs. EPP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly higher than EPP's 11.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AAXJ having a 4.51% annualized return and EPP not far behind at 4.40%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAXJ vs. EPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EPP's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAXJ vs. EPP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAXJ vs. EPP - Dividend Comparison
AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than EPP's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.76% | 2.26% | 1.73% | 2.20% | 1.05% | 1.82% | 2.09% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 2.43% | 1.77% | 1.76% |
EPP iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | 3.50% | 4.10% | 4.37% | 4.58% | 2.28% | 3.89% | 5.00% | 4.15% | 3.96% | 4.90% | 4.33% | 4.08% |
Drawdowns
AAXJ vs. EPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum EPP drawdown of -66.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and EPP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAXJ vs. EPP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) at 5.01%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.