AAXJ vs. BBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX).
AAXJ and BBAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAXJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2008. BBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. Both AAXJ and BBAX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAXJ or BBAX.
Performance
AAXJ vs. BBAX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than BBAX's 7.47% return.
AAXJ
12.06%
-5.46%
2.03%
15.82%
3.02%
3.59%
BBAX
7.47%
-2.66%
4.76%
16.29%
4.98%
N/A
Key characteristics
AAXJ | BBAX | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.94 | 1.11 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.41 | 1.61 |
Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.19 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.45 | 1.17 |
Martin Ratio | 4.35 | 5.15 |
Ulcer Index | 3.68% | 3.36% |
Daily Std Dev | 17.12% | 15.67% |
Max Drawdown | -49.37% | -39.64% |
Current Drawdown | -22.37% | -5.22% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAXJ vs. BBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between AAXJ and BBAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAXJ vs. BBAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAXJ vs. BBAX - Dividend Comparison
AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than BBAX's 4.35% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.85% | 2.26% | 1.73% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% | 1.78% | 1.77% |
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 4.35% | 4.17% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 2.57% | 4.07% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AAXJ vs. BBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than BBAX's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and BBAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAXJ vs. BBAX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) at 5.05%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.