AAPY vs. FTIF
AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while FTIF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. AAPY is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 37.65% vs 32.81% for FTIF. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
AAPY vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 23.96% return.
AAPY
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 37.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.99%
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $196.29K | $152.82K | $144.37K | |
| $81.13K | $75.23K | $58.24K |
AAPY vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.73% | 5.04% | 20.54% | 9.18% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 23.96% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPY and FTIF is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between AAPY and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPY vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
AAPY
FTIF
AAPY vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPY | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 5.20 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.45 | 15.06 | -8.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPY vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPY | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -27.83% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -6.34% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.26% | -1.96% | -8.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -5.89% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 2.18% | +3.67% |
Volatility
AAPY vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 11.55% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.78%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPY | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 2.78% | +8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 10.48% | +12.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.17% | 14.82% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 18.71% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 18.71% | +5.21% |
AAPY vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPY vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than FTIF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.81% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.08% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPY and FTIF have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPY has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to FTIF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 37.65% vs 32.81% for FTIF. On fees, FTIF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 37.65% return vs 32.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTIF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPY.
AAPY has the higher dividend yield at 11.81%, compared with 1.08% for FTIF.
AAPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTIF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPY and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPY and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer