PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPY vs. FTIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAPY vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAPY vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
-8.31%5.04%20.54%9.23%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
19.63%7.79%0.50%8.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 19.63% return.


AAPY

1D
3.36%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-1.70%
1Y
7.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTIF

1D
0.42%
1M
1.49%
YTD
19.63%
6M
23.49%
1Y
32.50%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPY vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AAPY vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPY
AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIF
FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPY vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPYFTIFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

1.42

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

2.00

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.31

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

1.93

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.43

9.48

-8.05

AAPY vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPY Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPY and FTIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPYFTIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

1.42

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.69

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and FTIF is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AAPY vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.59%, more than FTIF's 1.17% yield.


TTM202520242023
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
13.59%12.66%17.15%2.16%
FTIF
First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF
1.17%1.45%2.88%1.55%

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and FTIF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPYFTIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-27.83%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-17.27%

-2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.59%

-0.57%

-11.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-6.28%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.46%

3.51%

+2.95%

Volatility

AAPY vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 4.25%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAPYFTIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

4.25%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

11.64%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.07%

22.96%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

19.28%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

19.28%

+2.99%