PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AAPY vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and BDGS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

AAPY vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
17.25%
15.03%
AAPY
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AAPY:

1.26

BDGS:

4.63

Sortino Ratio

AAPY:

1.79

BDGS:

9.08

Omega Ratio

AAPY:

1.25

BDGS:

2.71

Calmar Ratio

AAPY:

1.71

BDGS:

8.67

Martin Ratio

AAPY:

4.40

BDGS:

50.51

Ulcer Index

AAPY:

4.96%

BDGS:

0.41%

Daily Std Dev

AAPY:

17.36%

BDGS:

4.48%

Max Drawdown

AAPY:

-12.77%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

AAPY:

0.00%

BDGS:

-0.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 20.51% return.


AAPY

YTD

22.19%

1M

9.06%

6M

17.46%

1Y

22.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

20.51%

1M

2.27%

6M

15.11%

1Y

20.58%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPY vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
Expense ratio chart for AAPY: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AAPY vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AAPY, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.264.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for AAPY, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.799.08
The chart of Omega ratio for AAPY, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.252.71
The chart of Calmar ratio for AAPY, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.718.67
The chart of Martin ratio for AAPY, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.4050.51
AAPY
BDGS

The current AAPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPY and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22
1.26
4.63
AAPY
BDGS

Dividends

AAPY vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, while BDGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
9.93%2.17%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.00%0.84%

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -12.77%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember0
-0.05%
AAPY
BDGS

Volatility

AAPY vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.61%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.48%
1.61%
AAPY
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab