PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPY vs. APLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPY vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than APLY's 7.08% return.


AAPY

1D
-7.73%
1M
-0.78%
6M
17.72%
YTD
11.62%
1Y
38.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.02%

APLY

1D
-7.10%
1M
-1.04%
6M
11.70%
YTD
7.08%
1Y
31.95%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$210.67K$187.15K$144.01K
$2.55M$1.69M$1.63M

AAPY vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
11.62%5.04%20.54%9.18%
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
7.08%4.69%18.62%13.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and APLY is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.90

The correlation between AAPY and APLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPY vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPY
AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPY vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPYAPLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.51

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

6.00

+0.23

AAPY vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the APLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPY and APLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, roughly equal to the maximum APLY drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and APLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPYAPLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-30.41%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-11.76%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.35%

-8.69%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-6.75%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

4.90%

+0.87%

Volatility

AAPY vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) at 10.36%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPYAPLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

10.36%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.02%

17.85%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

21.66%

+4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

21.73%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

21.73%

+2.17%

AAPY vs. APLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than APLY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPY vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.83%, less than APLY's 36.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
11.83%12.66%17.15%2.16%
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
36.59%36.38%24.95%14.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AAPY and APLY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAPY has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to APLY (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs APLY's -30.41%.

On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 38.20% vs 31.95% for APLY. On fees, AAPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, APLY has been the lower-risk option at 10.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 38.20% return vs 31.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for APLY.

APLY has the higher dividend yield at 36.59%, compared with 11.83% for AAPY.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPY and 1.04% for APLY.

AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPY and APLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer