AAPY vs. MSTY
AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 38.60% vs -73.76% for MSTY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AAPY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -35.55% return.
AAPY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 38.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -23.27%
- 6M
- -39.01%
- YTD
- -35.55%
- 1Y
- -73.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 15.38% | 5.04% | 25.92% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -35.55% | -42.71% | 212.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPY and MSTY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
AAPY
MSTY
AAPY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.75 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -0.95 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | -1.41 | +8.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -77.40% | +48.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -77.40% | +62.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -74.66% | +73.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -28.01% | +21.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 52.19% | -46.46% |
Volatility
AAPY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) is 10.91%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that AAPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.91% | 23.76% | -12.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 53.06% | -32.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.91% | 64.61% | -40.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 72.32% | -49.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 72.32% | -49.08% |
AAPY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAPY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AAPY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, less than MSTY's 289.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.34% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 289.43% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to AAPY (10.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs MSTY's -77.40%.
On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 38.60% vs -73.76% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPY has been the lower-risk option at 10.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 38.60% return vs -73.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 289.43%, compared with 11.34% for AAPY.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and YieldMax.
AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer