AAPY vs. AMZP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) and AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY returned 38.60% vs 8.45% for AMZP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

AAPY vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPY achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than AMZP's 3.26% return.

AAPY

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 8.12%
• 6M: 20.25%
• YTD: 15.38%
• 1Y: 38.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZP

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 3.59%
• 6M: -1.82%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 1Y: 8.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPY vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	15.38%	5.04%	20.54%	4.96%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	3.26%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPY and AMZP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	0.37

Return for Risk

AAPY vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPY

AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 61
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 51

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 14
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPY vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPY	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	0.28	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	0.59	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.07	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	0.36	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	0.83	+5.92

AAPY vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPY and AMZP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPY vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPY drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than AMZP's maximum drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY and AMZP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPY	AMZP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.22%	-27.36%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-23.64%	+9.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-11.89%	+10.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.32%	-6.31%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.73%	10.20%	-4.47%

Volatility

AAPY vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) at 10.26%. This indicates that AAPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPY	AMZP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.91%	10.26%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.01%	23.99%	-2.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.91%	30.40%	-6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.24%	27.14%	-3.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.24%	27.14%	-3.90%

AAPY vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAPY and AMZP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

AAPY vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

AAPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, less than AMZP's 18.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	11.34%	12.66%	17.15%	2.16%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	18.12%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPY and AMZP in my portfolio?

AAPY and AMZP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPY or AMZP?

AAPY has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to AMZP (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPY dropped -29.22% vs AMZP's -27.36%.

Which ETF is better, AAPY or AMZP?

On 1-year performance, AAPY leads with 38.60% vs 8.45% for AMZP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZP has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPY or AMZP?

Over the 1-year period, AAPY has performed better with a 38.60% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPY or AMZP?

AAPY and AMZP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPY or AMZP?

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 18.12%, compared with 11.34% for AAPY.

What is the main difference between AAPY and AMZP?

AAPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZP is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.