AAPL vs. WULF
AAPL (Apple Inc) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) are both stocks. AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while WULF operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 29.36%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for WULF. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 126.81% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed WULF with an annualized return of 29.36%, while WULF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.71% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
WULF
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 126.81%
- 6M
- 81.86%
- 1Y
- 511.74%
- 3Y*
- 163.16%
- 5Y*
- 23.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
AAPL vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 126.81% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | 77.08% | 86.34% | -36.55% | 12.13% | -33.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and WULF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1996 | 0.06 |
The correlation between AAPL and WULF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAPL:
$4.30T
WULF:
$11.02B
AAPL:
$8.24
WULF:
-$2.55
AAPL:
9.60
WULF:
62.38
AAPL:
$451.44B
WULF:
$168.06M
AAPL:
$216.07B
WULF:
$107.59M
AAPL:
$153.63B
WULF:
-$132.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
WULF
AAPL vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 16.26 | -12.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 43.34 | -34.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and WULF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -98.50% | +16.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -31.74% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -75.77% | +42.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -98.50% | +65.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -98.50% | +59.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -27.75% | +20.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.59% | -46.66% | +17.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 11.89% | -6.36% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a volatility of 25.07%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 25.07% | -18.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 65.58% | -49.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 106.31% | -83.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 127.55% | -100.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 101.43% | -72.51% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while WULF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AAPL vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and WULF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WULF has higher volatility (25.07%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs WULF's -98.50%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and WULF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer