WULF vs. CIFR
Compare and contrast key facts about TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WULF or CIFR.
Key characteristics
| WULF | CIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 76.67% | -25.18% |
| 1Y Return | 145.09% | 9.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -43.00% | -37.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 0.10 |
| Daily Std Dev | 123.13% | 117.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.50% | -97.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -88.24% | -78.72% |
Fundamentals
| WULF | CIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $1.04B |
| EPS | -$0.18 | $0.05 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $120.25M | $158.67M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $37.24M | $19.64M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $5.14M | $16.82M |
Correlation
The correlation between WULF and CIFR is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
WULF vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a 76.67% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's -25.18% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WULF vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WULF vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULF nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WULF vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and CIFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WULF vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a higher volatility of 30.70% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 22.99%. This indicates that WULF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WULF vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TeraWulf Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities