PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WULF vs. CIFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


WULFCIFR
YTD Return206.25%60.29%
1Y Return665.62%132.28%
3Y Return (Ann)-36.36%-7.72%
Sharpe Ratio4.961.08
Sortino Ratio3.842.19
Omega Ratio1.431.24
Calmar Ratio6.451.54
Martin Ratio22.894.14
Ulcer Index27.42%31.40%
Daily Std Dev126.55%120.47%
Max Drawdown-98.50%-97.16%
Current Drawdown-79.62%-54.41%

Fundamentals


WULFCIFR
Market Cap$3.26B$2.56B
EPS-$0.18-$0.15
Total Revenue (TTM)$101.29M$152.47M
Gross Profit (TTM)$26.55M$11.39M
EBITDA (TTM)$24.17M-$38.31M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between WULF and CIFR is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

WULF vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a 206.25% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's 60.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
246.54%
59.12%
WULF
CIFR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WULF vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WULF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WULF, currently valued at 4.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.96
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WULF, currently valued at 3.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WULF, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WULF, currently valued at 6.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WULF, currently valued at 22.89, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0022.89
CIFR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIFR, currently valued at 4.14, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.14

WULF vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WULF Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WULF and CIFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.96
1.08
WULF
CIFR

Dividends

WULF vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither WULF nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%33.22%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WULF vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and CIFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-79.62%
-54.41%
WULF
CIFR

Volatility

WULF vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) have volatilities of 37.10% and 37.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
37.10%
37.54%
WULF
CIFR

Financials

WULF vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TeraWulf Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items