WULF vs. CIFR

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WULF having a -54.06% return and CIFR slightly lower at -54.74%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WULF Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WULF and CIFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither WULF nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and CIFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) is 34.22%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 37.17%. This indicates that WULF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TeraWulf Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.