WULF vs. CIFR
Compare and contrast key facts about TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WULF or CIFR.
Correlation
The correlation between WULF and CIFR is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WULF vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WULF:
0.09
CIFR:
-0.32
WULF:
1.03
CIFR:
0.25
WULF:
1.11
CIFR:
1.03
WULF:
0.11
CIFR:
-0.42
WULF:
0.29
CIFR:
-0.99
WULF:
36.78%
CIFR:
36.36%
WULF:
119.31%
CIFR:
113.87%
WULF:
-98.50%
CIFR:
-97.16%
WULF:
-91.68%
CIFR:
-78.79%
Fundamentals
WULF:
$1.17B
CIFR:
$1.14B
WULF:
-$0.21
CIFR:
-$0.14
WULF:
8.33
CIFR:
7.56
WULF:
4.89
CIFR:
1.63
WULF:
$97.62M
CIFR:
$103.13M
WULF:
$49.42M
CIFR:
-$12.42M
WULF:
-$28.91M
CIFR:
-$2.27M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a -47.00% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's -33.62% return.
WULF
-47.00%
2.39%
-52.98%
21.46%
0.46%
-13.31%
CIFR
-33.62%
21.26%
-43.59%
-31.56%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WULF vs. CIFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WULF
CIFR
WULF vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WULF vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULF nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WULF vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and CIFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WULF vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) have volatilities of 38.32% and 36.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WULF vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TeraWulf Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities