WULF vs. MARA

In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a -31.27% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's -3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, WULF has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of -11.49%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -15.08% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WULF Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WULF and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither WULF nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and MARA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a higher volatility of 35.37% compared to Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) at 23.44%. This indicates that WULF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TeraWulf Inc. and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.