WULF vs. KARS
WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) is a stock, while KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. Over the past 3 years, WULF returned 150.55%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for KARS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WULF vs. KARS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a 146.39% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's 9.74% return.
WULF
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 24.06%
- YTD
- 146.39%
- 6M
- 127.02%
- 1Y
- 656.95%
- 3Y*
- 150.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KARS
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- 1Y
- 58.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- -3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
WULF vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 146.39% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | -52.66% |
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 9.74% | 46.04% | -17.88% | -7.85% | -39.20% | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between WULF and KARS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WULF vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank
WULF
KARS
WULF vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WULF | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.35 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.89 | 3.75 | +17.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.44 | 13.33 | +43.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WULF vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.30%, which is greater than KARS's maximum drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and KARS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WULF | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.30% | -64.85% | -33.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.74% | -15.68% | -16.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.77% | -47.79% | -27.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.95% | -33.11% | +22.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.61% | -28.33% | -53.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 4.40% | +7.33% |
Volatility
WULF vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a higher volatility of 23.77% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 10.95%. This indicates that WULF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WULF | KARS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.77% | 10.95% | +12.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.44% | 20.86% | +41.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.79% | 27.51% | +78.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.70% | 30.04% | +97.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.70% | 29.38% | +98.32% |
Dividends
WULF vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison
WULF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WULF and KARS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WULF has higher volatility (23.77%) compared to KARS (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WULF dropped -98.30% vs KARS's -64.85%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WULF and KARS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer