PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WULF vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WULF vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WULF vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
26.02%103.00%135.83%260.58%-95.58%77.08%86.34%-36.55%10.66%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
5.44%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-28.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a 26.02% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's 5.44% return.


WULF

1D
0.35%
1M
-9.61%
YTD
26.02%
6M
26.24%
1Y
402.78%
3Y*
149.01%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
3.71%

KARS

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
5.44%
6M
4.53%
1Y
53.05%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
-3.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WULF vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WULF
WULF Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
WULF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WULF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
WULF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WULF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WULF Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WULF vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WULFKARSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.58

1.87

+1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

2.48

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

13.56

2.93

+10.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

34.43

12.69

+21.74

WULF vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WULF Sharpe Ratio is 3.58, which is higher than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WULF and KARS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WULFKARSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

1.87

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.13

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.16

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between WULF and KARS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WULF vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

WULF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%33.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.17%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%

Drawdowns

WULF vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, which is greater than KARS's maximum drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and KARS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WULFKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.50%

-64.85%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.74%

-17.74%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.50%

-64.85%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.86%

-35.73%

-24.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.72%

-28.31%

-18.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.50%

4.09%

+8.41%

Volatility

WULF vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a higher volatility of 25.51% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 9.01%. This indicates that WULF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WULFKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.51%

9.01%

+16.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.13%

19.50%

+49.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.57%

28.52%

+85.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.24%

29.61%

+97.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.85%

29.32%

+71.53%