PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WULF vs. BTC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WULF vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WULF vs. BTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
29.50%103.00%135.83%260.58%-95.58%77.08%86.34%-36.55%12.13%-33.16%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-23.70%-6.27%120.76%155.82%-64.23%59.40%304.57%94.10%-73.37%1,324.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a 29.50% return, which is significantly higher than BTC-USD's -23.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WULF has underperformed BTC-USD with an annualized return of 4.29%, while BTC-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 66.03% annualized return.


WULF

1D
2.76%
1M
0.95%
YTD
29.50%
6M
28.50%
1Y
399.33%
3Y*
143.55%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
4.29%

BTC-USD

1D
-1.99%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
-23.70%
6M
-44.66%
1Y
-19.07%
3Y*
33.89%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
66.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WULF vs. BTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WULF
WULF Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
WULF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WULF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WULF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
WULF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WULF Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WULF vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WULFBTC-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.55

-0.43

+3.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

-0.36

+4.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.96

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

13.13

-1.14

+14.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.21

-2.03

+35.24

WULF vs. BTC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WULF Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WULF and BTC-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WULFBTC-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

-0.43

+3.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.06

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.97

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.18

-1.09

Correlation

The correlation between WULF and BTC-USD is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

WULF vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, which is greater than BTC-USD's maximum drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and BTC-USD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WULFBTC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.50%

-85.30%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.74%

-49.65%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.50%

-76.67%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.50%

-83.80%

-14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.75%

-46.47%

-12.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.72%

-42.00%

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.55%

27.75%

-15.20%

Volatility

WULF vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a higher volatility of 25.29% compared to Bitcoin (BTC-USD) at 13.70%. This indicates that WULF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WULFBTC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.29%

13.70%

+11.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.17%

35.96%

+33.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.49%

36.69%

+76.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.19%

46.91%

+80.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.83%

56.71%

+44.12%