AAPL vs. TMF
AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock, while TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 29.63%/yr vs -17.04%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AAPL vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of 29.63%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -17.04% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
TMF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -8.42%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- -2.46%
- 3Y*
- -21.29%
- 5Y*
- -31.41%
- 10Y*
- -17.04%
AAPL vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -8.42% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and TMF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2009 | -0.14 |
The correlation between AAPL and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
TMF
AAPL vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.01 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | -0.09 | +3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | -0.21 | +9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | -0.09 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.68 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | -0.39 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.14 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -92.89% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -26.51% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -56.31% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -88.81% | +55.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -92.89% | +54.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -92.42% | +88.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -43.66% | +14.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 11.70% | -6.22% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 5.68%, while Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 7.77% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.99% | 19.06% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 28.25% | -5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.47% | 46.72% | -19.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 43.92% | -15.01% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than TMF's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.26% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and TMF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs TMF's -92.89%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer