AADR vs. DWUS
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AADR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AADR returned 6.23%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for DWUS. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for DWUS.
Performance
AADR vs. DWUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than DWUS's 15.72% return.
AADR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
DWUS
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
AADR vs. DWUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -1.56% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -22.93% | 6.48% | 13.13% | -1.14% |
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 15.72% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -17.89% | 20.21% | 35.99% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and DWUS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AADR and DWUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
AADR vs. DWUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AADR
DWUS
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
AADR
DWUS
Basic Materials
AADR
DWUS
Financial Services
AADR
DWUS
Industrials
AADR
DWUS
Technology
AADR
DWUS
Energy
AADR
DWUS
Communication Services
AADR
DWUS
Utilities
AADR
DWUS
Consumer Cyclical
AADR
DWUS
Consumer Defensive
AADR
DWUS
Real Estate
AADR
-
DWUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. DWUS — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
DWUS
AADR vs. DWUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AADR | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.28 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 2.08 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 7.89 | -6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AADR | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.61 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.64 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.72 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
AADR vs. DWUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than DWUS's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and DWUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -30.47% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -11.98% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -19.63% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -26.45% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | 0.00% | -12.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -6.86% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 3.16% | +3.66% |
Volatility
AADR vs. DWUS - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) at 4.85%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 4.85% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.55% | 12.46% | +5.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 15.46% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 18.82% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 21.88% | +0.32% |
AADR vs. DWUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DWUS's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADR vs. DWUS - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than DWUS's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.54% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and DWUS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AADR has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to DWUS (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs DWUS's -30.47%.
On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 12.00% vs 6.23% for AADR. On fees, AADR is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, DWUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AADR is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.
AADR has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.
AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while DWUS is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 1.17% for DWUS.
DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADR and DWUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer