PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWUS vs. DWSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWUS vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than DWSH's -1.41% return.


DWUS

1D
-1.95%
1M
4.85%
YTD
13.97%
6M
14.75%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*

DWSH

1D
-0.17%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
-1.41%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
-8.62%
3Y*
-3.70%
5Y*
-1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWUS vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
13.97%12.75%20.26%20.62%-17.89%20.21%35.99%9.39%
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
-1.41%-2.57%5.98%-22.04%17.45%-25.74%-49.95%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DWUS and DWSH is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019

-0.48

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DWUS and DWSH has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.48 to -0.25, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

DWUS vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWUS
DWSH

Technology

44.3%
-24.0%

Industrials

11.2%
-13.3%

Financial Services

10.2%
-9.4%

Communication Services

8.9%
-5.0%

Healthcare

7.6%
-12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
-16.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
-8.3%

Energy

3.3%
-1.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
-5.1%

Basic Materials

1.6%
-0.8%

Utilities

1.5%

-

Technology

DWUS
44.3%
DWSH
-24.0%

Industrials

DWUS
11.2%
DWSH
-13.3%

Financial Services

DWUS
10.2%
DWSH
-9.4%

Communication Services

DWUS
8.9%
DWSH
-5.0%

Healthcare

DWUS
7.6%
DWSH
-12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DWUS
6.1%
DWSH
-16.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWUS
3.7%
DWSH
-8.3%

Energy

DWUS
3.3%
DWSH
-1.1%

Real Estate

DWUS
1.6%
DWSH
-5.1%

Basic Materials

DWUS
1.6%
DWSH
-0.8%

Utilities

DWUS
1.5%
DWSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWUS vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWUS vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWUSDWSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.95

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

-0.54

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

-0.87

+8.44

DWUS vs. DWSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the DWSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWUS and DWSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWUS vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum DWSH drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and DWSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWUSDWSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.47%

-82.73%

+52.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-16.02%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-29.23%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.45%

-32.87%

+6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-81.68%

+79.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-63.66%

+56.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

9.94%

-6.69%

Volatility

DWUS vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) at 5.58%. This indicates that DWUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWUSDWSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.98%

5.58%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

13.84%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.37%

20.68%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

25.94%

-6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

31.15%

-8.79%

DWUS vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWUS vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison

DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DWSH's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.40%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWUS and DWSH have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWUS has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to DWSH (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs DWSH's -82.73%.

On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 10.84% vs -1.63% for DWSH. On fees, DWUS is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 10.84% return vs -1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWUS is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.

DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 3.67% for DWSH.

DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWUS and DWSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer