DWUS vs. DWSH
DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) and DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWUS returned 9.09%/yr vs -3.25%/yr for DWSH. Their -0.45 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DWUS charges 1.17%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for DWSH.
Performance
DWUS vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWUS achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than DWSH's -8.54% return.
DWUS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 12.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.25%
DWSH
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- -7.16%
- 3Y*
- -2.58%
- 5Y*
- -3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $223.87K | $613.62K | $411.74K | |
| $15.57K | $21.17K | $89.22K |
DWUS vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 5.98% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -17.89% | 20.21% | 35.99% | 9.39% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | -8.54% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWUS and DWSH is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019 | -0.45 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DWUS and DWSH has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.45 to -0.14, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
DWUS vs. DWSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWUS
DWSH
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DWUS
DWSH
Industrials
DWUS
DWSH
Communication Services
DWUS
DWSH
Consumer Cyclical
DWUS
DWSH
Energy
DWUS
DWSH
Consumer Defensive
DWUS
DWSH
Healthcare
DWUS
DWSH
Financial Services
DWUS
DWSH
Basic Materials
DWUS
DWSH
Utilities
DWUS
DWSH
Real Estate
DWUS
DWSH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWUS vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank
DWUS
DWSH
DWUS vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWUS | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.96 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | -0.38 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | -0.81 | +4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWUS vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWUS drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, smaller than the maximum DWSH drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWUS and DWSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWUS | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -83.55% | +53.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -18.88% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -32.61% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.45% | -36.09% | +9.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -83.00% | +72.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -63.90% | +57.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 8.85% | -5.08% |
Volatility
DWUS vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) is 8.53%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that DWUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWUS | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 11.74% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 17.54% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 22.45% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 26.49% | -7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 31.25% | -8.74% |
DWUS vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWUS has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWUS vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison
DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DWSH's 6.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.90% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWUS and DWSH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to DWUS (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWUS dropped -30.47% vs DWSH's -83.55%.
On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 9.09% vs -3.25% for DWSH. On fees, DWUS is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, DWUS has been the lower-risk option at 8.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 9.09% return vs -3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DWUS is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.90%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.
DWUS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for DWUS and 3.67% for DWSH.
DWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWUS and DWSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer