AABFX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
AABFX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Dec 28, 1997. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
AABFX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AABFX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | -2.16% | 12.23% | 10.08% | 12.04% | -13.93% | 11.83% | 8.69% | 16.65% | -5.09% | 2.21% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's -3.62% return.
AABFX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 9.39%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AABFX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AABFX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
AABFX
PALDX
AABFX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AABFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 1.12 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.65 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.42 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 6.83 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AABFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.12 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.67 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.71 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between AABFX and PALDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AABFX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than PALDX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund | 6.76% | 7.25% | 6.43% | 2.97% | 2.26% | 6.99% | 2.03% | 2.37% | 9.70% | 2.04% | 2.37% | 1.90% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AABFX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AABFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.44% | -26.16% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.52% | -8.20% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.56% | -20.47% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -5.96% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -4.16% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 1.70% | -0.36% |
Volatility
AABFX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) is 2.75%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that AABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AABFX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 3.05% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 5.86% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.64% | 11.52% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 12.08% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 12.75% | -3.47% |