PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AABFX vs. AAHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than AAHYX's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AABFX has outperformed AAHYX with an annualized return of 6.75%, while AAHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.


AABFX

1D
0.27%
1M
2.58%
YTD
5.63%
6M
5.92%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
6.75%

AAHYX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.72%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.01%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AABFX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund
5.63%12.23%10.08%12.04%-13.93%11.83%8.69%16.65%-5.09%10.06%
AAHYX
Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund
3.82%9.57%6.80%9.27%-12.64%6.22%6.67%13.12%-3.08%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AABFX and AAHYX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997

0.69

Over the past year, AABFX and AAHYX have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AABFX vs. AAHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AABFX
AABFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AAHYX
AAHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AAHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AABFXAAHYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.80

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.59

4.09

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.57

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.35

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.43

14.93

-1.50

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AABFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the AAHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AABFX and AAHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AABFXAAHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.80

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.72

-0.29

Drawdowns

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than AAHYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and AAHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AABFXAAHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

-34.18%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-3.54%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.04%

-6.23%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.56%

-16.52%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.40%

-20.04%

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-4.56%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

0.79%

+0.37%

Volatility

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX) at 1.52%. This indicates that AABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AABFXAAHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

1.52%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.16%

3.42%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33%

4.24%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.53%

5.78%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

6.02%

+3.29%

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AAHYX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Dividend Comparison

AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than AAHYX's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AABFX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund
6.84%7.25%6.43%2.97%2.26%6.99%2.03%2.37%9.70%2.04%2.37%1.90%
AAHYX
Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund
3.66%3.73%3.83%3.55%3.10%6.31%2.44%3.54%5.72%2.85%3.39%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AABFX and AAHYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AABFX has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to AAHYX (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AABFX dropped -43.44% vs AAHYX's -34.18%.

AAHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AABFX and AAHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer