PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AABFX vs. AAHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than AAHYX's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AABFX has outperformed AAHYX with an annualized return of 6.48%, while AAHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.67% annualized return.


AABFX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.20%
6M
3.83%
YTD
5.50%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
6.48%
ALL TIME*
4.92%

AAHYX

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.40%
6M
2.02%
YTD
3.22%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
4.67%
ALL TIME*
4.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AABFX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund
5.50%12.23%10.08%12.04%-13.93%11.83%8.69%16.65%-5.09%10.06%
AAHYX
Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund
3.22%9.57%6.80%9.27%-12.64%6.22%6.67%13.12%-3.08%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AABFX and AAHYX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1997

0.69

Over the past year, AABFX and AAHYX have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AABFX vs. AAHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AABFX
AABFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AAHYX
AAHYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AAHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AAHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AABFXAAHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.28

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

9.60

+0.23

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AABFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the AAHYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AABFX and AAHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than AAHYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and AAHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AABFXAAHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

-34.18%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-3.54%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.04%

-5.06%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.56%

-16.52%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.40%

-20.04%

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.78%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-4.53%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.84%

+0.38%

Volatility

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund (AAHYX) at 1.34%. This indicates that AABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AABFXAAHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

1.34%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.84%

3.79%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.97%

4.54%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.61%

5.84%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

6.02%

+3.28%

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AAHYX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

AABFX vs. AAHYX - Dividend Comparison

AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than AAHYX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AABFX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund
7.07%7.25%6.43%2.97%2.26%6.99%2.03%2.37%9.70%2.04%2.37%1.90%
AAHYX
Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund
3.43%3.73%3.83%3.55%3.10%6.31%2.44%3.54%5.72%2.85%3.39%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AABFX and AAHYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AABFX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to AAHYX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AABFX dropped -43.44% vs AAHYX's -34.18%.

AAHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AABFX and AAHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer