AAAC vs. INEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) and INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAAC is a CLO fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while INEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for INEQ.

Performance

AAAC vs. INEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAC achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than INEQ's 7.02% return.

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INEQ

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 7.02%
• 6M: 10.22%
• 1Y: 25.77%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. INEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	7.02%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and INEQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

AAAC vs. INEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INEQ

INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 57
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAC vs. INEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAC	INEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.56	0.60	+4.96

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. INEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum INEQ drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and INEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAC	INEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-41.71%	+41.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.77%	+3.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-7.06%	+7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAC	INEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89%	13.48%	-12.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.89%	15.30%	-14.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.89%	16.31%	-15.42%

AAAC vs. INEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INEQ's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAC vs. INEQ - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than INEQ's 9.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	9.22%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAC and INEQ in my portfolio?

AAAC and INEQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAAC or INEQ?

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAC or INEQ?

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAC or INEQ?

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between AAAC and INEQ?

AAAC is categorized as CLO, while INEQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.45% for INEQ.