AAAC vs. JAAA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

AAAC vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAC achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 2.07% return.

AAAC

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JAAA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.31%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 6.58%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.32%	0.15%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	2.07%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and JAAA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

AAAC vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 98
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAC vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAC	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	6.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	10.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	2.72	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	12.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	69.26	—

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum JAAA drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and JAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAC	JAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-2.64%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.02%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-0.25%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAC	JAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86%	0.83%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.86%	1.67%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.86%	1.64%	-0.78%

AAAC vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAAC and JAAA have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AAAC vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than JAAA's 4.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	4.99%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAC and JAAA in my portfolio?

AAAC and JAAA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAAC or JAAA?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAC or JAAA?

AAAC and JAAA have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAC or JAAA?

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between AAAC and JAAA?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Janus Henderson.