PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAC vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAC vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAC achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 1.89% return.


AAAC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.06%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.49%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.06%0.20%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
1.89%0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and JAAA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAC vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAC

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAC vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAAC vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAACJAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.59

2.78

+2.81

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum JAAA drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and JAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAACJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-2.64%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.25%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

AAAC vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAACJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

0.85%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.89%

1.68%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.89%

1.64%

-0.75%

AAAC vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAAC vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than JAAA's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.27%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
5.00%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAC and JAAA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for JAAA.

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.21% for JAAA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAC and JAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer