AAAC vs. FCLO
AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) and FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCLO.
Performance
AAAC vs. FCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AAAC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAC vs. FCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF | 1.26% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAC and FCLO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAAC vs. FCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAAC | FCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.59 | 3.94 | +1.65 |
Drawdowns
AAAC vs. FCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum FCLO drawdown of -0.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and FCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAC | FCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.58% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.09% | +0.05% |
Volatility
AAAC vs. FCLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAAC | FCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89% | 1.47% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.89% | 1.47% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.89% | 1.47% | -0.58% |
AAAC vs. FCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAAC vs. FCLO - Dividend Comparison
AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than FCLO's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF | 2.27% | 0.03% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAAC and FCLO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCLO.
AAAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.56% for FCLO.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.45% for FCLO.
Find the right allocation for AAAC and FCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer