PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAC vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAC vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AAAC having a 2.06% return and CLOA slightly lower at 2.04%.


AAAC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.06%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLOA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.50%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.06%0.20%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
2.04%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and CLOA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAC vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAC

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAC vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAAC vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAACCLOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.59

5.22

+0.37

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum CLOA drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and CLOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAACCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-1.34%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.05%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

Volatility

AAAC vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAACCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

0.71%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.89%

1.32%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.89%

1.32%

-0.43%

AAAC vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAAC and CLOA have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAAC vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than CLOA's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.27%0.03%0.00%0.00%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
4.96%5.35%6.01%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAC and CLOA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAC and CLOA have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

CLOA has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and BlackRock.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAC and CLOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer