PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AA vs. EQNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AA vs. EQNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a 29.83% return, which is significantly lower than EQNR's 56.74% return.


AA

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.64%
YTD
29.83%
6M
49.53%
1Y
140.52%
3Y*
24.73%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*

EQNR

1D
-1.55%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
56.74%
6M
60.62%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
18.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AA vs. EQNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AA
Alcoa Corporation
29.83%42.46%12.43%-24.33%-23.12%159.05%7.16%-19.07%-47.41%
EQNR
Equinor ASA
56.74%7.70%-15.98%-0.78%40.77%64.55%-13.57%-0.99%-21.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AA and EQNR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between AA and EQNR has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AA:

$18.13B

EQNR:

$90.56B

EPS

AA:

$3.92

EQNR:

$2.15

PE Ratio

AA:

17.55

EQNR:

16.84

PEG Ratio

AA:

0.05

EQNR:

0.52

PS Ratio

AA:

1.42

EQNR:

0.89

PB Ratio

AA:

2.66

EQNR:

2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

AA:

$12.66B

EQNR:

$104.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AA:

$948.00M

EQNR:

$36.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

AA:

$1.70B

EQNR:

$39.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AA vs. EQNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AA
AA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

EQNR
EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AA vs. EQNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAEQNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.49

2.54

+3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.55

4.31

+16.24

AA vs. EQNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AA Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the EQNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AA and EQNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AA vs. EQNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than EQNR's maximum drawdown of -66.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and EQNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.90%

-66.77%

-24.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.77%

-17.72%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.25%

-27.58%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.46%

-35.50%

-39.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.27%

-13.80%

-10.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.12%

-21.46%

-24.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

10.41%

-3.54%

Volatility

AA vs. EQNR - Volatility Comparison

Alcoa Corporation (AA) has a higher volatility of 21.35% compared to Equinor ASA (EQNR) at 10.50%. This indicates that AA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.35%

10.50%

+10.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.11%

29.99%

+11.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.44%

36.03%

+18.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.26%

33.91%

+22.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.66%

36.25%

+19.41%

Dividends

AA vs. EQNR - Dividend Comparison

AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than EQNR's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AA
Alcoa Corporation
0.58%0.75%1.06%1.18%0.88%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%
EQNR
Equinor ASA
4.15%7.66%12.66%11.38%3.30%2.13%4.32%5.07%3.26%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AA vs. EQNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alcoa Corporation and Equinor ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
3.19B
27.82B
(AA) Total Revenue
(EQNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AA vs. EQNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alcoa Corporation and Equinor ASA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
44.3%
Portfolio components
AA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EQNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

AA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EQNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

AA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

EQNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AA and EQNR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AA has higher volatility (21.35%) compared to EQNR (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AA dropped -90.90% vs EQNR's -66.77%.

AA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AA and EQNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer