PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQNR vs. PEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQNR vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Equinor ASA (EQNR) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQNR achieves a 64.41% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's 0.20% return.


EQNR

1D
0.34%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
64.41%
6M
66.02%
1Y
65.04%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*

PEP

1D
0.38%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
0.20%
6M
-1.92%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
-5.24%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQNR vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQNR
Equinor ASA
64.41%7.70%-15.98%-0.78%40.77%64.55%-13.57%-0.99%-21.06%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
0.20%-1.85%-7.60%-3.29%6.78%20.56%11.67%27.38%16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EQNR and PEP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQNR:

$94.99B

PEP:

$195.42B

EPS

EQNR:

$2.15

PEP:

$6.37

PE Ratio

EQNR:

17.67

PEP:

22.37

PEG Ratio

EQNR:

0.55

PEP:

7.74

PS Ratio

EQNR:

0.94

PEP:

2.05

PB Ratio

EQNR:

2.18

PEP:

9.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQNR:

$104.23B

PEP:

$95.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQNR:

$36.46B

PEP:

$51.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQNR:

$39.36B

PEP:

$15.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQNR vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQNR
EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PEP
PEP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQNR vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equinor ASA (EQNR) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQNRPEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.12

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

0.77

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

2.12

+4.26

EQNR vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQNR and PEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQNRPEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

0.58

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.12

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.38

-0.07

Drawdowns

EQNR vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQNR drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNR and PEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQNRPEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-73.92%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.72%

-16.25%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-29.17%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.50%

-30.32%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.58%

-19.58%

+10.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.50%

-13.64%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

5.87%

+4.35%

Volatility

EQNR vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

Equinor ASA (EQNR) has a higher volatility of 13.51% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 6.35%. This indicates that EQNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQNRPEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.51%

6.35%

+7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.62%

14.90%

+14.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.82%

21.71%

+14.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.84%

18.38%

+15.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.28%

19.66%

+16.62%

Dividends

EQNR vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

EQNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than PEP's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQNR
Equinor ASA
3.95%7.66%12.66%11.38%3.30%2.13%4.32%5.07%3.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.99%3.92%3.51%2.91%2.50%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%

Financials

EQNR vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equinor ASA and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
27.82B
19.44B
(EQNR) Total Revenue
(PEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQNR vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Equinor ASA and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
44.3%
55.2%
Portfolio components
EQNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

EQNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

EQNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQNR and PEP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQNR has higher volatility (13.51%) compared to PEP (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQNR dropped -66.77% vs PEP's -73.92%.

EQNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQNR and PEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer