AA vs. KALU
AA (Alcoa Corporation) and KALU (Kaiser Aluminum Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aluminum industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, AA returned 3.44%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for KALU. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
AA vs. KALU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a -14.55% return, which is significantly lower than KALU's 41.10% return.
AA
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -20.07%
- YTD
- -14.55%
- 1Y
- 60.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.22%
KALU
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- 6M
- 31.39%
- YTD
- 41.10%
- 1Y
- 121.28%
- 3Y*
- 29.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $224.13M | $268.35M | $320.12M | |
| $50.88M | $45.39M | $47.39M |
AA vs. KALU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa Corporation | -14.55% | 42.46% | 12.43% | -24.33% | -23.12% | 159.05% | 7.16% | -19.07% | -50.66% | 91.84% |
KALU Kaiser Aluminum Corporation | 41.10% | 70.14% | 2.75% | -2.14% | -16.17% | -2.44% | -7.57% | 27.24% | -14.68% | 40.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AA and KALU is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between AA and KALU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
AA:
$11.94B
KALU:
$2.61B
AA:
$4.86
KALU:
$13.53
AA:
9.32
KALU:
11.80
AA:
0.02
KALU:
0.32
AA:
0.87
KALU:
0.65
AA:
1.62
KALU:
2.86
AA:
$13.60B
KALU:
$4.14B
AA:
$876.00M
KALU:
$477.50M
AA:
$1.99B
KALU:
$472.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AA vs. KALU — Risk / Return Rank
AA
KALU
AA vs. KALU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AA | KALU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.37 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 4.30 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 14.02 | -10.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AA vs. KALU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than KALU's maximum drawdown of -82.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and KALU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AA | KALU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.90% | -82.08% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.82% | -26.03% | -22.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.25% | -48.85% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.46% | -55.76% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.16% | -18.03% | -32.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -25.47% | -20.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.20% | 8.02% | +8.18% |
Volatility
AA vs. KALU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alcoa Corporation (AA) is 11.93%, while Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that AA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KALU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AA | KALU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.93% | 19.04% | -7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.10% | 38.31% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.66% | 49.00% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.16% | 44.96% | +11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 42.47% | +13.16% |
Dividends
AA vs. KALU - Dividend Comparison
AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than KALU's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa Corporation | 0.88% | 0.75% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 0.88% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 0.00% |
KALU Kaiser Aluminum Corporation | 1.93% | 2.68% | 4.38% | 4.33% | 4.05% | 3.07% | 2.71% | 2.16% | 2.46% | 1.87% | 2.32% | 1.91% |
Financials
AA vs. KALU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alcoa Corporation and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AA vs. KALU - Profitability Comparison
AA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of -681.00M and revenue of 3.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -17.2%.
KALU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a gross profit of 169.10M and revenue of 1.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.5%.
AA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of -426.00M and revenue of 3.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -10.7%.
KALU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported an operating income of 133.70M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
AA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 407.00M and revenue of 3.97B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
KALU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reported a net income of 96.80M and revenue of 1.26B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AA and KALU have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KALU has higher volatility (19.04%) compared to AA (11.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AA dropped -90.90% vs KALU's -82.08%.
KALU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AA and KALU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer