EQNR vs. XOM
EQNR (Equinor ASA) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Integrated industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, EQNR returned 18.95%/yr vs 24.35%/yr for XOM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
EQNR vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQNR achieves a 63.11% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 28.05% return.
EQNR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 63.11%
- 6M
- 64.92%
- 1Y
- 65.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 18.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XOM
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 28.05%
- 6M
- 31.55%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 24.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
EQNR vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQNR Equinor ASA | 63.11% | 7.70% | -15.98% | -0.78% | 40.77% | 64.55% | -13.57% | -0.99% | -21.06% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 28.05% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQNR and XOM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EQNR and XOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
EQNR:
$94.24B
XOM:
$635.98B
EQNR:
$2.15
XOM:
$5.93
EQNR:
17.53
XOM:
25.65
EQNR:
0.55
XOM:
1.19
EQNR:
0.93
XOM:
1.99
EQNR:
2.16
XOM:
2.50
EQNR:
$104.23B
XOM:
$326.01B
EQNR:
$36.46B
XOM:
$83.11B
EQNR:
$39.36B
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQNR vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
EQNR
XOM
EQNR vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equinor ASA (EQNR) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQNR | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.42 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 9.70 | -3.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQNR | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.19 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.92 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.48 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
EQNR vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQNR drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNR and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQNR | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.77% | -62.40% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.72% | -15.69% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -18.92% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.50% | -20.51% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.29% | -10.73% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.50% | -10.20% | -11.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | 5.52% | +4.72% |
Volatility
EQNR vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Equinor ASA (EQNR) has a higher volatility of 13.50% compared to Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) at 10.07%. This indicates that EQNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQNR | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.50% | 10.07% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.64% | 20.30% | +9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.83% | 24.49% | +11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.84% | 26.73% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.27% | 28.18% | +8.09% |
Dividends
EQNR vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
EQNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than XOM's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQNR Equinor ASA | 3.98% | 7.66% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 3.30% | 2.13% | 4.32% | 5.07% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.68% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
EQNR vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equinor ASA and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQNR vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
EQNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
EQNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
EQNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQNR and XOM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQNR has higher volatility (13.50%) compared to XOM (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQNR dropped -66.77% vs XOM's -62.40%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQNR and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer