PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQNR vs. SHEL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQNR vs. SHEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Equinor ASA (EQNR) and Shell plc (SHEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQNR achieves a 64.41% return, which is significantly higher than SHEL's 20.27% return.


EQNR

1D
0.34%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
64.41%
6M
66.02%
1Y
65.04%
3Y*
22.79%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*

SHEL

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
20.27%
6M
17.64%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
22.88%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQNR vs. SHEL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQNR
Equinor ASA
64.41%7.70%-15.98%-0.78%40.77%64.55%-13.57%-0.99%-21.06%
SHEL
Shell plc
20.27%22.16%-0.87%20.19%36.18%34.27%-41.08%6.38%-17.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EQNR and SHEL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.73

The correlation between EQNR and SHEL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EQNR:

$94.99B

SHEL:

$247.46B

EPS

EQNR:

$2.15

SHEL:

$6.39

PE Ratio

EQNR:

17.67

SHEL:

13.57

PEG Ratio

EQNR:

0.55

SHEL:

0.68

PS Ratio

EQNR:

0.94

SHEL:

0.95

PB Ratio

EQNR:

2.18

SHEL:

1.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQNR:

$104.23B

SHEL:

$266.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQNR:

$36.46B

SHEL:

$41.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQNR:

$39.36B

SHEL:

$57.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQNR vs. SHEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQNR
EQNR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EQNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SHEL
SHEL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SHEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SHEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQNR vs. SHEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equinor ASA (EQNR) and Shell plc (SHEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQNRSHELDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.57

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

2.12

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.05

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.38

8.75

-2.37

EQNR vs. SHEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SHEL Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQNR and SHEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQNRSHELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.57

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.91

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.22

+0.08

Drawdowns

EQNR vs. SHEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQNR drawdown since its inception was -66.77%, smaller than the maximum SHEL drawdown of -71.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNR and SHEL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQNRSHELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-71.57%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.72%

-10.81%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-18.47%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.50%

-25.04%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.58%

-7.00%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.50%

-16.74%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.22%

3.76%

+6.46%

Volatility

EQNR vs. SHEL - Volatility Comparison

Equinor ASA (EQNR) has a higher volatility of 13.51% compared to Shell plc (SHEL) at 7.27%. This indicates that EQNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQNRSHELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.51%

7.27%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.62%

17.46%

+12.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.82%

21.03%

+14.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.84%

25.20%

+8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.28%

30.86%

+5.42%

Dividends

EQNR vs. SHEL - Dividend Comparison

EQNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than SHEL's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQNR
Equinor ASA
3.95%7.66%12.66%11.38%3.30%2.13%4.32%5.07%3.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHEL
Shell plc
3.41%3.90%4.39%3.76%3.48%3.78%5.69%6.27%6.27%2.75%6.49%8.17%

Financials

EQNR vs. SHEL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equinor ASA and Shell plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
27.82B
69.57B
(EQNR) Total Revenue
(SHEL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQNR vs. SHEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Equinor ASA and Shell plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
44.3%
19.1%
Portfolio components
EQNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

SHEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a gross profit of 13.31B and revenue of 69.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

EQNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

SHEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported an operating income of 10.35B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

EQNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.

SHEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Shell plc reported a net income of 5.68B and revenue of 69.57B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQNR and SHEL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQNR has higher volatility (13.51%) compared to SHEL (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQNR dropped -66.77% vs SHEL's -71.57%.

EQNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQNR and SHEL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer