AA vs. MP
AA (Alcoa Corporation) and MP (MP Materials Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — AA in Aluminum, MP in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 5 years, AA returned 11.83%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for MP. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AA vs. MP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than MP's 19.34% return.
AA
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -18.25%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 111.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
MP
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- 19.34%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 59.75%
- 3Y*
- 41.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AA vs. MP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa Corporation | 10.16% | 42.46% | 12.43% | -24.33% | -23.12% | 159.05% | 100.78% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | 19.34% | 223.85% | -21.41% | -18.25% | -46.54% | 41.19% | 224.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between AA and MP is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020 | 0.40 |
The correlation between AA and MP shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AA:
$3.92
MP:
-$0.53
AA:
1.21
MP:
26.57
AA:
$12.66B
MP:
$305.30M
AA:
$948.00M
MP:
$25.30M
AA:
$1.70B
MP:
$1.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AA vs. MP — Risk / Return Rank
AA
MP
AA vs. MP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and MP Materials Corp. (MP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AA | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 1.12 | +2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.26 | 1.84 | +12.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AA vs. MP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than MP's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and MP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AA | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.90% | -81.99% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.36% | -53.79% | +23.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.25% | -59.47% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.46% | -81.99% | +6.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.74% | -38.88% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -42.58% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 32.64% | -24.80% |
Volatility
AA vs. MP - Volatility Comparison
Alcoa Corporation (AA) and MP Materials Corp. (MP) have volatilities of 21.88% and 22.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AA | MP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.88% | 22.62% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 51.35% | -9.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.14% | 91.87% | -36.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.31% | 69.62% | -13.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.68% | 72.59% | -16.91% |
Dividends
AA vs. MP - Dividend Comparison
AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while MP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa Corporation | 0.69% | 0.75% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 0.88% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% |
MP MP Materials Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AA vs. MP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alcoa Corporation and MP Materials Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AA vs. MP - Profitability Comparison
AA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
MP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AA and MP have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MP has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to AA (21.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AA dropped -90.90% vs MP's -81.99%.
AA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AA and MP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer