PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Michael Burry Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


MOH 35.00%LULU 27.00%SLM 19.00%BRKR 19.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Michael Burry Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Michael Burry Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 20, 2026, the Michael Burry Portfolio returned -7.05% Year-To-Date and 14.98% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.00%-0.71%8.39%8.57%24.33%18.94%12.24%13.54%
Portfolio
Michael Burry Portfolio
1.14%6.31%-7.05%-5.38%-21.43%-8.42%-2.81%14.98%
BRKR
Bruker Corporation
4.57%25.26%21.66%23.31%50.90%-8.48%-4.25%9.33%
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
0.01%-12.12%-46.22%-46.64%-50.86%-33.67%-20.30%4.53%
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
-0.08%6.10%12.58%19.35%-33.55%-11.09%-3.99%14.15%
SLM
SLM Corporation
0.35%4.60%-13.81%-14.72%-25.51%14.17%6.04%15.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 27, 2007, Michael Burry Portfolio's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.59%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.7 years.

Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Jan 2012 with a return of +27.5%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -35.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Michael Burry Portfolio closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 24, 2008 with a return of +12.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -17.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-4.09%-11.91%-9.39%14.81%3.87%1.82%-7.05%
20254.64%-6.22%-5.07%-2.45%2.67%-5.56%-22.58%0.74%-5.39%-4.64%9.33%5.65%-28.38%
2024-3.27%9.48%0.62%-11.63%-9.05%-4.09%4.79%0.09%1.65%-3.91%4.90%5.81%-6.60%
2023-1.49%-7.72%4.84%9.24%-8.00%10.07%-1.11%-2.04%0.95%-1.39%12.73%11.46%27.74%
2022-12.19%3.48%3.72%-6.60%-2.62%-7.05%11.10%-3.61%-4.83%14.48%4.88%-5.73%-8.10%
20212.30%3.19%6.51%8.74%-0.63%6.09%4.93%0.83%-2.65%8.56%-2.36%2.70%44.51%

Benchmark Metrics

Michael Burry Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 8.26%, beta of 1.11, and R2 of 0.52 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 27, 2007.

  • This portfolio captured 140.12% of S&P 500 Index gains and 107.50% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 8.26% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 1.11 and R2 of 0.52, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
8.26%
Beta
1.11
0.52
Upside Capture
140.12%
Downside Capture
107.50%

Expense Ratio

Michael Burry Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Michael Burry Portfolio ranks 2 for risk / return — in the bottom 2% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Michael Burry Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
Michael Burry Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Michael Burry Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
Michael Burry Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
Michael Burry Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
Michael Burry Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Michael Burry Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

1.94

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

2.65

-3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.35

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

2.66

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

11.86

-12.65


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BRKR
Bruker Corporation
67
0.901.511.181.252.41
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
4
-1.16-1.700.78-0.93-1.65
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
21
-0.57-0.440.93-0.57-0.77
SLM
SLM Corporation
17
-0.68-0.700.90-0.57-1.02

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Michael Burry Portfolio Sharpe ratio is -0.72 as of Jun 20, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.67 to 2.57, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Michael Burry Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Michael Burry Portfolio provided a 0.48% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Portfolio0.48%0.45%0.38%0.49%0.56%0.23%0.24%0.32%0.10%0.09%0.14%
BRKR
Bruker Corporation
0.26%0.42%0.34%0.27%0.29%0.19%0.30%0.31%0.54%0.47%0.76%
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLM
SLM Corporation
2.26%1.92%1.67%2.30%2.65%1.02%0.97%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Michael Burry Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Michael Burry Portfolio was 73.92%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 275 trading sessions.

The current Michael Burry Portfolio drawdown is 44.34%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-73.92%Mar 2009
1y 4mo1y 1mo
2y 5moOct 2007 - Apr 2010
2026 bear market2026
-55.73%Mar 2026
2y 8d
2y 3moMar 2024 - now
2011 bear market2011
-37.66%Oct 2011
2mo 28d4mo 1d
6mo 29dJul 2011 - Feb 2012
COVID crash2020
-35.71%Mar 2020
1mo 2d2mo 7d
3mo 9dFeb 2020 - May 2020
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-27.78%Dec 2018
3mo 8d3mo 10d
6mo 18dSep 2018 - Apr 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


The gist

The portfolio is a four-way bet on businesses that are not especially correlated with one another, which is the most respectable way to build a concentrated portfolio without pretending it is anything else.

The numbers

  • Diversification ratio is 1.68 at 1Y and 1.48 since inception, both around the 76th-79th percentile; that is real diversification, not decorative ticker variety.
  • Effective asset count is 3.74 of 4, so the weights are spread cleanly rather than hiding a single dominant position.
  • Pairwise correlations cluster in a narrow band, 0.24-0.36; the portfolio has four separate clusters, which is what "separate bets" looks like in the math.

The good

  • Molina Healthcare (MOH), Lululemon Athletica (LULU), SLM Corp. (SLM), and Bruker (BRKR) sit on different business drivers, so the portfolio is not just one macro factor wearing four disguises.
  • MOH and LULU at 0.24 correlation is especially useful; healthcare reimbursement and athletic apparel do not usually share the same earnings weather.

The bad

  • BRKR is the nearest thing to a shared factor magnet, with the highest correlations to every other holding; it is the glue here, but glue is not a free lunch.
  • The portfolio’s strongest names still have fairly high portfolio correlations, with MOH at 0.71 and LULU at 0.68, so each position matters a lot to the whole.

The ugly

  • If the market turns into a "growth duration plus cyclicals" trade, LULU and BRKR can start moving in the same direction for reasons that have little to do with their businesses, and the neat correlation matrix gets less neat.

Next steps

  • Portfolios with this profile are often judged more by what happens in stress periods than by the average correlation, because the average is already decent.
  • The mix is strong enough that changes in one sleeve’s volatility can matter disproportionately to the whole.
  • This is the kind of portfolio where the thesis is not "one theme" but "several unrelated themes, inconveniently alive at the same time."
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.74, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.68

1.63

1.57

1.51

1.48

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.48, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

Michael Burry Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Michael Burry Portfolio has a 0.40 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.66


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. BRKR has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.55, while MOH has the lowest at 0.40.

MOH
0.40
LULU
0.51
SLM
0.53
BRKR
0.55

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Michael Burry Portfolio. MOH has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.71, while SLM has the lowest at 0.57.

SLM
0.57
BRKR
0.63
LULU
0.68
MOH
0.71

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

MOHSLMLULUBRKR
MOH1.000.240.240.33
SLM0.241.000.300.32
LULU0.240.301.000.36
BRKR0.330.320.361.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 27, 2007
Diversification Analysis

Find what Michael Burry Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Michael Burry Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification