Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | Healthcare | 35% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 27% |
SLM SLM Corporation | Financial Services | 19% |
BRKR Bruker Corporation | Healthcare | 19% |
Find the right asset allocation for Michael Burry Portfolio
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Michael Burry Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of Jun 20, 2026, the Michael Burry Portfolio returned -7.05% Year-To-Date and 14.98% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.00% | -0.71% | 8.39% | 8.57% | 24.33% | 18.94% | 12.24% | 13.54% |
Portfolio Michael Burry Portfolio | 1.14% | 6.31% | -7.05% | -5.38% | -21.43% | -8.42% | -2.81% | 14.98% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 4.57% | 25.26% | 21.66% | 23.31% | 50.90% | -8.48% | -4.25% | 9.33% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.01% | -12.12% | -46.22% | -46.64% | -50.86% | -33.67% | -20.30% | 4.53% |
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | -0.08% | 6.10% | 12.58% | 19.35% | -33.55% | -11.09% | -3.99% | 14.15% |
SLM SLM Corporation | 0.35% | 4.60% | -13.81% | -14.72% | -25.51% | 14.17% | 6.04% | 15.51% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 27, 2007, Michael Burry Portfolio's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.59%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.7 years.
Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Jan 2012 with a return of +27.5%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -35.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, Michael Burry Portfolio closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 24, 2008 with a return of +12.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -17.8%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.09% | -11.91% | -9.39% | 14.81% | 3.87% | 1.82% | -7.05% | ||||||
| 2025 | 4.64% | -6.22% | -5.07% | -2.45% | 2.67% | -5.56% | -22.58% | 0.74% | -5.39% | -4.64% | 9.33% | 5.65% | -28.38% |
| 2024 | -3.27% | 9.48% | 0.62% | -11.63% | -9.05% | -4.09% | 4.79% | 0.09% | 1.65% | -3.91% | 4.90% | 5.81% | -6.60% |
| 2023 | -1.49% | -7.72% | 4.84% | 9.24% | -8.00% | 10.07% | -1.11% | -2.04% | 0.95% | -1.39% | 12.73% | 11.46% | 27.74% |
| 2022 | -12.19% | 3.48% | 3.72% | -6.60% | -2.62% | -7.05% | 11.10% | -3.61% | -4.83% | 14.48% | 4.88% | -5.73% | -8.10% |
| 2021 | 2.30% | 3.19% | 6.51% | 8.74% | -0.63% | 6.09% | 4.93% | 0.83% | -2.65% | 8.56% | -2.36% | 2.70% | 44.51% |
Benchmark Metrics
Michael Burry Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 8.26%, beta of 1.11, and R2 of 0.52 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 27, 2007.
- This portfolio captured 140.12% of S&P 500 Index gains and 107.50% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 8.26% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- With beta of 1.11 and R2 of 0.52, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 8.26%
- Beta
- 1.11
- R²
- 0.52
- Upside Capture
- 140.12%
- Downside Capture
- 107.50%
Expense Ratio
Michael Burry Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Michael Burry Portfolio ranks 2 for risk / return — in the bottom 2% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Michael Burry Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | 1.94 | -2.67 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | 2.65 | -3.49 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.35 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.66 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 11.86 | -12.65 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 67 | 0.90 | 1.51 | 1.18 | 1.25 | 2.41 |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 4 | -1.16 | -1.70 | 0.78 | -0.93 | -1.65 |
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | 21 | -0.57 | -0.44 | 0.93 | -0.57 | -0.77 |
SLM SLM Corporation | 17 | -0.68 | -0.70 | 0.90 | -0.57 | -1.02 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Michael Burry Portfolio provided a 0.48% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.48% | 0.45% | 0.38% | 0.49% | 0.56% | 0.23% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.14% |
| Portfolio components: | |||||||||||
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 0.26% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.54% | 0.47% | 0.76% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLM SLM Corporation | 2.26% | 1.92% | 1.67% | 2.30% | 2.65% | 1.02% | 0.97% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Michael Burry Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Michael Burry Portfolio was 73.92%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 275 trading sessions.
The current Michael Burry Portfolio drawdown is 44.34%.
Related event | Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial crisis2007–2009 | -73.92%Mar 2009 | 1y 4mo | 1y 1mo | 2y 5moOct 2007 - Apr 2010 |
2026 bear market2026 | -55.73%Mar 2026 | 2y 8d | — | 2y 3moMar 2024 - now |
2011 bear market2011 | -37.66%Oct 2011 | 2mo 28d | 4mo 1d | 6mo 29dJul 2011 - Feb 2012 |
COVID crash2020 | -35.71%Mar 2020 | 1mo 2d | 2mo 7d | 3mo 9dFeb 2020 - May 2020 |
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 | -27.78%Dec 2018 | 3mo 8d | 3mo 10d | 6mo 18dSep 2018 - Apr 2019 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
AI Analysis
The gist
The portfolio is a four-way bet on businesses that are not especially correlated with one another, which is the most respectable way to build a concentrated portfolio without pretending it is anything else.
The numbers
- Diversification ratio is 1.68 at 1Y and 1.48 since inception, both around the 76th-79th percentile; that is real diversification, not decorative ticker variety.
- Effective asset count is 3.74 of 4, so the weights are spread cleanly rather than hiding a single dominant position.
- Pairwise correlations cluster in a narrow band, 0.24-0.36; the portfolio has four separate clusters, which is what "separate bets" looks like in the math.
The good
- Molina Healthcare (MOH), Lululemon Athletica (LULU), SLM Corp. (SLM), and Bruker (BRKR) sit on different business drivers, so the portfolio is not just one macro factor wearing four disguises.
- MOH and LULU at 0.24 correlation is especially useful; healthcare reimbursement and athletic apparel do not usually share the same earnings weather.
The bad
- BRKR is the nearest thing to a shared factor magnet, with the highest correlations to every other holding; it is the glue here, but glue is not a free lunch.
- The portfolio’s strongest names still have fairly high portfolio correlations, with MOH at 0.71 and LULU at 0.68, so each position matters a lot to the whole.
The ugly
- If the market turns into a "growth duration plus cyclicals" trade, LULU and BRKR can start moving in the same direction for reasons that have little to do with their businesses, and the neat correlation matrix gets less neat.
Next steps
- Portfolios with this profile are often judged more by what happens in stress periods than by the average correlation, because the average is already decent.
- The mix is strong enough that changes in one sleeve’s volatility can matter disproportionately to the whole.
- This is the kind of portfolio where the thesis is not "one theme" but "several unrelated themes, inconveniently alive at the same time."
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.74, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.68 | 1.63 | 1.57 | 1.51 | 1.48 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.48, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.
Michael Burry Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.66 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. BRKR has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.55, while MOH has the lowest at 0.40.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what Michael Burry Portfolio is missing
See which holdings overlap, where Michael Burry Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification