PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLM vs. MOH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLM vs. MOH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SLM Corporation (SLM) and Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLM achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than MOH's 34.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SLM has underperformed MOH with an annualized return of 15.30%, while MOH has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.


SLM

1D
0.93%
1M
11.53%
6M
-8.45%
YTD
-6.58%
1Y
-23.69%
3Y*
17.35%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
15.30%

MOH

1D
0.53%
1M
16.49%
6M
28.55%
YTD
34.44%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
-8.16%
5Y*
-1.93%
10Y*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLM vs. MOH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLM
SLM Corporation
-6.58%-0.20%47.25%18.70%-13.47%60.54%40.89%8.60%-26.46%2.54%
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
34.44%-40.37%-19.45%9.41%3.82%49.56%56.74%16.75%51.56%41.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SLM and MOH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2003

0.22

The correlation between SLM and MOH shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLM:

$4.71B

MOH:

$12.16B

EPS

SLM:

$3.65

MOH:

$3.63

PE Ratio

SLM:

6.84

MOH:

64.28

PEG Ratio

SLM:

1.04

MOH:

25.88

PS Ratio

SLM:

2.27

MOH:

0.27

PB Ratio

SLM:

2.03

MOH:

2.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLM:

$2.25B

MOH:

$45.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLM:

$1.09B

MOH:

$2.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLM:

$599.19M

MOH:

$617.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLM vs. MOH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLM
SLM Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MOH
MOH Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOH Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOH Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLM vs. MOH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLM Corporation (SLM) and Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLMMOHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.07

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

0.05

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

0.08

-1.08

SLM vs. MOH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLM Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the MOH Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLM and MOH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLM vs. MOH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLM drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than MOH's maximum drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLM and MOH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLMMOHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.50%

-70.76%

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.70%

-44.64%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.06%

-70.76%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.06%

-70.76%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.79%

-70.76%

+18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.89%

-44.39%

+18.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-24.67%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.71%

26.97%

-2.26%

Volatility

SLM vs. MOH - Volatility Comparison

SLM Corporation (SLM) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) at 11.63%. This indicates that SLM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLMMOHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

11.63%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.47%

44.25%

-13.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.04%

56.44%

-17.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.92%

40.10%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.76%

40.87%

-4.11%

Dividends

SLM vs. MOH - Dividend Comparison

SLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while MOH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MOH
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLM
SLM Corporation
2.08%1.92%1.67%2.30%2.65%1.02%0.97%1.35%

Financials

SLM vs. MOH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLM Corporation and Molina Healthcare, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
10.80B
(SLM) Total Revenue
(MOH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SLM and MOH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLM has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to MOH (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLM dropped -94.50% vs MOH's -70.76%.

MOH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLM and MOH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer