BRKR vs. SLM
BRKR (Bruker Corporation) and SLM (SLM Corporation) are both stocks. BRKR operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while SLM operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, BRKR returned 8.95%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for SLM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BRKR vs. SLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKR achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than SLM's -16.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BRKR has underperformed SLM with an annualized return of 8.95%, while SLM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.22% annualized return.
BRKR
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 23.67%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 36.75%
- 3Y*
- -10.64%
- 5Y*
- -5.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
SLM
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -16.24%
- 6M
- -15.71%
- 1Y
- -27.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
BRKR vs. SLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 15.29% | -19.24% | -19.99% | 7.82% | -18.29% | 55.35% | 6.58% | 71.85% | -12.82% | 62.96% |
SLM SLM Corporation | -16.24% | -0.20% | 47.25% | 18.70% | -13.47% | 60.54% | 40.89% | 8.60% | -26.46% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKR and SLM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
BRKR:
$8.28B
SLM:
$4.43B
BRKR:
-$0.17
SLM:
$3.63
BRKR:
2.39
SLM:
2.04
BRKR:
3.36
SLM:
1.82
BRKR:
$3.46B
SLM:
$2.25B
BRKR:
$1.57B
SLM:
$1.09B
BRKR:
$224.20M
SLM:
$599.19M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRKR vs. SLM — Risk / Return Rank
BRKR
SLM
BRKR vs. SLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bruker Corporation (BRKR) and SLM Corporation (SLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRKR | SLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.88 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | -0.62 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.79 | -1.11 | +2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRKR vs. SLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKR drawdown since its inception was -94.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SLM drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKR and SLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKR | SLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.83% | -94.50% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.85% | -45.06% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.72% | -45.06% | -23.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.72% | -45.06% | -23.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.72% | -51.79% | -16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.96% | -33.55% | -8.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.69% | -29.89% | -27.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.54% | 24.92% | -4.38% |
Volatility
BRKR vs. SLM - Volatility Comparison
Bruker Corporation (BRKR) has a higher volatility of 20.05% compared to SLM Corporation (SLM) at 11.73%. This indicates that BRKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRKR | SLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.05% | 11.73% | +8.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.84% | 29.17% | +9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.15% | 38.21% | +16.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.50% | 36.03% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 36.97% | +0.76% |
Dividends
BRKR vs. SLM - Dividend Comparison
BRKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SLM's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 0.37% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.54% | 0.47% | 0.76% |
SLM SLM Corporation | 2.32% | 1.92% | 1.67% | 2.30% | 2.65% | 1.02% | 0.97% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BRKR vs. SLM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bruker Corporation and SLM Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BRKR and SLM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRKR has higher volatility (20.05%) compared to SLM (11.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRKR dropped -94.83% vs SLM's -94.50%.
BRKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRKR and SLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer