SPIT vs. VOO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).

SPIT and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPIT is an actively managed fund by F/m Investments. It was launched on Aug 1, 2014. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.

Performance

SPIT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SPIT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	2.31%	5.20%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	-4.42%	1.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.

SPIT

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -6.38%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -5.01%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 18.27%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

SPIT

F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

SPIT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 65
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPIT	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.83	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between SPIT and VOO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SPIT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	7.02%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.19%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Drawdowns

SPIT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPIT	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.49%	-33.99%	+21.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.39%	-6.29%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-3.72%	+0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPIT	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.61%	18.10%	+9.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.61%	16.82%	+10.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.61%	17.99%	+9.62%