ZSL vs. SLVP
ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both Silver funds - ZSL tracks the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x) while SLVP tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSL returned -43.74%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for SLVP. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. ZSL charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
ZSL vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -59.81% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSL has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of -43.74%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.67% annualized return.
ZSL
- 1D
- 5.33%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- -59.81%
- 6M
- -75.78%
- 1Y
- -92.31%
- 3Y*
- -69.67%
- 5Y*
- -51.93%
- 10Y*
- -43.74%
SLVP
- 1D
- -5.14%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 112.07%
- 3Y*
- 52.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
ZSL vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -59.81% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | -2.04% | -74.44% | -27.76% | 18.15% | -18.99% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.25% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSL and SLVP is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | -0.73 |
The correlation between ZSL and SLVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSL vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
ZSL
SLVP
ZSL vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSL | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | 2.12 | -2.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | 2.40 | -4.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.33 | -0.58 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 3.36 | -4.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 8.53 | -9.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSL | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | 2.12 | -2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | 0.38 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.67 | 0.32 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.09 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
ZSL vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSL | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -80.47% | -19.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.55% | -33.57% | -60.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.40% | -33.57% | -64.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.06% | -54.78% | -44.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.82% | -62.03% | -37.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -26.25% | -73.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.39% | -46.82% | -49.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.23% | 13.18% | +55.05% |
Volatility
ZSL vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) has a higher volatility of 32.31% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 17.59%. This indicates that ZSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSL | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.31% | 17.59% | +14.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.86% | 43.22% | +62.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.48% | 53.06% | +66.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.07% | 42.76% | +31.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.20% | 42.24% | +22.96% |
ZSL vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSL vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.74% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSL and SLVP have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSL has higher volatility (32.31%) compared to SLVP (17.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs SLVP's -80.47%.
On 10-year performance, SLVP leads with 13.67% vs -43.74% for ZSL. On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SLVP has been the lower-risk option at 17.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 13.67% return vs -43.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.
ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSL and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer