ZSL vs. DUST
ZSL (ProShares UltraShort Silver) and DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSL is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZSL returned -38.53%/yr vs -48.81%/yr for DUST. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZSL charges 1.32%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for DUST.
Performance
ZSL vs. DUST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSL achieves a -41.40% return, which is significantly lower than DUST's -13.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSL has outperformed DUST with an annualized return of -38.53%, while DUST has yielded a comparatively lower -48.81% annualized return.
ZSL
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 32.58%
- YTD
- -41.40%
- 1Y
- -87.23%
- 3Y*
- -64.77%
- 5Y*
- -49.69%
- 10Y*
- -38.53%
- ALL TIME*
- -41.76%
DUST
- 1D
- 6.62%
- 1M
- 8.88%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- -13.22%
- 1Y
- -72.70%
- 3Y*
- -60.67%
- 5Y*
- -47.24%
- 10Y*
- -48.81%
- ALL TIME*
- -48.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.19M | $36.63M | $44.10M | |
| $62.12M | $66.02M | $102.33M |
ZSL vs. DUST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | -41.40% | -87.29% | -42.43% | -5.49% | -28.09% | -2.04% | -74.44% | -27.76% | 18.15% | -18.99% |
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -13.22% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -22.70% | -4.82% | -85.75% | -75.11% | -3.27% | -51.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSL and DUST is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ZSL and DUST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSL vs. DUST — Risk / Return Rank
ZSL
DUST
ZSL vs. DUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZSL | DUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.87 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -1.09 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZSL vs. DUST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum DUST drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSL and DUST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSL | DUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.72% | -85.03% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.40% | -97.55% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.06% | -98.68% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.82% | -99.98% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -100.00% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -83.50% | -12.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 74.55% | 68.24% | +6.31% |
Volatility
ZSL vs. DUST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) is 22.62%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that ZSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSL | DUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.62% | 25.85% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 96.58% | 77.14% | +19.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.38% | 96.41% | +27.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.74% | 73.80% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.98% | 86.65% | -20.67% |
ZSL vs. DUST - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSL has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DUST's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZSL vs. DUST - Dividend Comparison
ZSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 4.37% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
ZSL ProShares UltraShort Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSL and DUST have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to ZSL (22.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSL dropped -100.00% vs DUST's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, ZSL leads with -38.53% vs -48.81% for DUST. On fees, DUST is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, ZSL has been the lower-risk option at 22.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ZSL has performed better with a -38.53% return vs -48.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUST is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for ZSL.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.00% for ZSL.
ZSL is categorized as Silver, while DUST is Leveraged Equities. ZSL tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (-2x), while DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for ZSL and 1.07% for DUST.
ZSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSL and DUST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer